Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;23(6):795-801. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1593566. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
The Hartford Consensus and Stop the Bleed Campaign empower the public to stop bleeding. While evidence for civilian tourniquet use is mounting, there is limited evidence regarding the public's ability to use hemostatic dressings. This study seeks to determine if laypeople can apply hemostatic dressings, and which hemostatic dressing they can use most successfully. 360 layperson participants in Maryland and Virginia completed 4 arms of this randomized, prospective controlled trial: plain gauze (control), z-folded gauze, s-rolled gauze, and injectable sponge (experimental) arms. Participants watched a standardized video, practiced hands-on dressing application, and were assessed applying the dressing via checklists and feedback mechanisms for pressure, timing, and packing. Participants completed pre and post questionnaires regarding willingness to use hemostatic dressings. Overall, 202 participants (56%) applied the dressings correctly, and 83 (92%) applied the injectable sponges correctly. This is a significant difference from the other arms (p < 0.001), and OR 17.2 (95% CI 6.8 - 48.1) compared to control. 38 participants (40%) correctly applied plain gauze, while 37 (43%) and 44 (48%) participants correctly applied z-folded and s-rolled gauzes. The primary reasons for failure were not holding pressure long enough (n = 103, 65%) and not applying adequate pressure (n = 64, 41%). Participants in all arms had significant improvements in willingness to use hemostatic dressings: 154 (43.6%) participants pre vs. 344 (97.5%) post study participation (p < 0.001). More than half of laypeople can apply hemostatic dressings, and they are most successful applying injectable sponges. Brief education increases laypeople's reported willingness to use hemostatic dressings. Educators and planners should consider including injectable sponges in their Stop the Bleed programs and products. II (RCT with significant difference. One negative criterion for observer blinding).
《哈特福德共识》和“停止出血”运动赋予公众止血的能力。虽然民间使用止血带的证据越来越多,但关于公众使用止血敷料的能力的证据有限。本研究旨在确定非专业人员是否可以使用止血敷料,以及他们可以最成功地使用哪种止血敷料。马里兰州和弗吉尼亚州的 360 名非专业人员参加了这项随机、前瞻性对照试验的 4 个部分:普通纱布(对照)、Z 形折叠纱布、S 形卷纱布和注射海绵(实验)部分。参与者观看了标准化视频,练习了实际的敷料应用,并通过检查表和反馈机制评估了他们在压力、时间和包装方面的应用情况。参与者在预试验和后试验中完成了关于使用止血敷料意愿的问卷。
总体而言,202 名参与者(56%)正确应用了敷料,83 名(92%)正确应用了注射海绵。与其他手臂相比,这是一个显著的差异(p < 0.001),与对照组相比,OR 为 17.2(95% CI 6.8-48.1)。38 名参与者(40%)正确应用了普通纱布,而 37 名(43%)和 44 名(48%)参与者正确应用了 Z 形折叠和 S 形卷纱布。失败的主要原因是未保持足够的压力(n = 103,65%)和未施加足够的压力(n = 64,41%)。所有手臂的参与者在使用止血敷料的意愿方面都有显著改善:154 名参与者(43.6%)在研究前 vs. 344 名参与者(97.5%)在研究后参与(p < 0.001)。超过一半的非专业人员可以应用止血敷料,他们最成功地应用注射海绵。简短的教育增加了非专业人员报告使用止血敷料的意愿。教育者和规划者应考虑在其“停止出血”计划和产品中包含注射海绵。II(具有显著差异的 RCT。观察者盲法的一个负标准)。