• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Ceftriaxone plus Metronidazole versus Anti-Pseudomonal Antibiotics for Perforated Appendicitis in Children.头孢曲松联合甲硝唑对比抗假单胞菌抗生素治疗儿童穿孔性阑尾炎的疗效比较。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Jul;20(5):399-405. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.234. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
2
Once-Daily Ceftriaxone Plus Metronidazole Versus Ertapenem and/or Cefoxitin for Pediatric Appendicitis.每日一次头孢曲松联合甲硝唑与厄他培南和/或头孢西丁治疗小儿阑尾炎的比较
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017 Mar 1;6(1):57-64. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piv082.
3
Ceftriaxone with Metronidazole versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the management of complicated appendicitis in children: Results from a multicenter pediatric NSQIP analysis.头孢曲松联合甲硝唑与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗儿童复杂性阑尾炎的多中心儿科 NSQIP 分析结果。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Oct;57(10):365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
4
Dual versus Triple Antibiotics Regimen in Children with Perforated Acute Appendicitis.急性穿孔性阑尾炎患儿使用双联抗生素方案与三联抗生素方案的对比
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Dec;28(6):491-494. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606847. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
5
Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole vs standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial.儿童穿孔性阑尾炎每日单次剂量头孢曲松和甲硝唑与标准三联抗生素方案的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jun;43(6):981-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.018.
6
Reducing Piperacillin and Tazobactam Use for Pediatric Perforated Appendicitis.减少儿童穿孔性阑尾炎中哌拉西林和他唑巴坦的使用。
J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.067. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
7
Postoperative Antibiotics for Complicated Appendicitis in Children: Piperacillin/Tazobactam Versus Ceftriaxone with Metronidazole.儿童复杂性阑尾炎术后抗生素治疗:哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢曲松加甲硝唑的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Jun;58(6):1128-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.02.027. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
8
Extended Versus Narrow-spectrum Antibiotics in the Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: A Propensity-matched Comparative Effectiveness Study.儿童单纯性阑尾炎管理中广谱与窄谱抗生素的应用:一项倾向评分匹配的比较有效性研究。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):186-192. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002349.
9
A complete course of intravenous antibiotics vs a combination of intravenous and oral antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective, randomized trial.儿童穿孔性阑尾炎行静脉用抗生素全程治疗与静脉用和口服抗生素联合治疗的前瞻性随机试验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jun;45(6):1198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.090.
10
Extended- Versus Narrower-Spectrum Antibiotics for Appendicitis.阑尾炎的广谱抗生素与窄谱抗生素比较。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4547.

引用本文的文献

1
Better care for children with appendicitis: implementation of antibiotic stewardship optimizes postoperative therapy.更好地护理阑尾炎患儿:实施抗生素管理可优化术后治疗。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2025 Mar 5;20:Doc06. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000535. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of the efficacy of carbapenems and cephalosporins for postoperative treatment of perforated appendicitis in children.碳青霉烯类与头孢菌素类用于儿童穿孔性阑尾炎术后治疗的疗效比较
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):104712. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.104712.
3
Perforated Appendicitis in Children: Management, Microbiology, and Antibiotic Stewardship.儿童穿孔性阑尾炎:处理、微生物学和抗生素管理。
Paediatr Drugs. 2024 May;26(3):277-286. doi: 10.1007/s40272-024-00630-0. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
4
Association between bacterial resistance profile and the development of intra-abdominal abscesses in pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis: cohort study.阑尾穿孔患儿细菌耐药谱与腹腔脓肿发生的相关性:队列研究。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Dec 11;40(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05570-3.
5
Antipseudomonal Versus Narrow-Spectrum Agents for the Treatment of Community-Onset Intra-abdominal Infections.抗假单胞菌药物与窄谱药物治疗社区获得性腹腔内感染的比较
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 15;8(11):ofab514. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab514. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Management and Microbiology of Perforated Appendicitis in Pediatric Patients: A 5-Year Retrospective Study.小儿穿孔性阑尾炎的管理与微生物学:一项5年回顾性研究
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Dec;10(4):2247-2257. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00502-x. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Appendicitis Grade, Operative Duration, and Hospital Cost.阑尾炎分级、手术时间和住院费用。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):578-583. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.046. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Defining the association between operative time and outcomes in children's surgery.界定儿童手术中手术时间与手术结果之间的关联。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct;52(10):1561-1566. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.044. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
3
The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection.外科感染学会关于腹腔内感染管理的修订指南。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Jan;18(1):1-76. doi: 10.1089/sur.2016.261.
4
Intravenous Versus Oral Antibiotics for the Prevention of Treatment Failure in Children With Complicated Appendicitis: Has the Abandonment of Peripherally Inserted Catheters Been Justified?静脉用与口服抗生素用于预防复杂性阑尾炎患儿治疗失败:是否有理由放弃外周静脉置入中心静脉导管?
Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):361-368. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001923.
5
Extended- Versus Narrower-Spectrum Antibiotics for Appendicitis.阑尾炎的广谱抗生素与窄谱抗生素比较。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4547.
6
Identifying Antimicrobial Stewardship Targets for Pediatric Surgical Patients.确定小儿外科患者的抗菌药物管理目标
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2015 Dec;4(4):e100-8. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piv022. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
7
Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection.腹腔内感染短程抗菌治疗试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):1996-2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411162.
8
Peritoneal fluid culture and antibiotic treatment in patients with perforated appendicitis in a Pacific Island.太平洋岛屿上阑尾炎穿孔患者的腹腔液培养与抗生素治疗
Asian J Surg. 2015 Oct;38(4):242-6. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 May 2.
9
The microbiology of bacterial peritonitis due to appendicitis in children.儿童阑尾炎所致细菌性腹膜炎的微生物学
Ir J Med Sci. 2014 Dec;183(4):585-91. doi: 10.1007/s11845-013-1055-2. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
10
Risk factors for gastrointestinal tract colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species in hospitalized patients.住院患者中产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)大肠埃希菌和克雷伯菌属胃肠道定植的危险因素。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;33(12):1242-5. doi: 10.1086/668443. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

头孢曲松联合甲硝唑对比抗假单胞菌抗生素治疗儿童穿孔性阑尾炎的疗效比较。

Comparative Effectiveness of Ceftriaxone plus Metronidazole versus Anti-Pseudomonal Antibiotics for Perforated Appendicitis in Children.

机构信息

1 Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC.

2 Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Jul;20(5):399-405. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.234. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1089/sur.2018.234
PMID:30874482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6555178/
Abstract

Appendicitis is the most common pediatric surgical emergency and one of the most common indications for antibiotic use in hospitalized children. The antibiotic choice differs widely across children's hospitals, and the optimal regimen for perforated appendicitis remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing initial antibiotic regimens for perforated appendicitis at a large tertiary-care children's hospital. Children hospitalized between January 2011 and March 2015 who underwent surgery for perforated appendicitis were identified by ICD-9 codes with confirmation by chart review. Patients were excluded if they had been admitted ≥48 hours prior to diagnosis, had a history of appendicitis, received inotropic agents, were immunocompromised, or were given an antibiotic regimen other than ceftriaxone plus metronidazole (CTX/MTZ) or an anti-pseudomonal drug (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, or meropenem) within the first two days after diagnosis. The primary outcome of interest was post-operative complications, defined as development of an incisional infection or abscess within six weeks of hospital discharge. Of the 353 children who met the inclusion criteria, 252 (71%) received CTX/MTZ and the others received an anti-pseudomonal regimen. A post-operative complication occurred in 37 (14.7%) of the CTX/MTZ group versus 18 (17.8%) of the anti-pseudomonal group. Antibiotic-related complications occurred in 4.4% of children on CTX/MTZ and 6.9% of children on anti-pseudomonal antibiotics (p = 0.32). In a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for sex, age, ethnicity, and duration of symptoms prior to presentation, the adjusted odds ratio for post-operative complications in children receiving anti-pseudomonal antibiotics was 1.25 (95% confidence interval 0.66-2.40). Post-operative complication rates did not differ for children treated with CTX/MTZ versus a broader-spectrum regimen.

摘要

阑尾炎是最常见的小儿外科急症之一,也是住院儿童中最常见的抗生素使用指征之一。儿童医院之间的抗生素选择差异很大,穿孔性阑尾炎的最佳治疗方案仍不清楚。我们对一家大型三级儿童保健医院的穿孔性阑尾炎初始抗生素治疗方案进行了回顾性队列研究。通过 ICD-9 编码识别 2011 年 1 月至 2015 年 3 月期间因穿孔性阑尾炎接受手术的住院患儿,并通过病历回顾进行确认。如果患者在诊断前已住院≥48 小时、有阑尾炎病史、使用正性肌力药物、免疫功能低下或在诊断后前 2 天内接受头孢曲松加甲硝唑(CTX/MTZ)或抗假单胞菌药物(头孢吡肟、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、环丙沙星、亚胺培南或美罗培南)以外的抗生素治疗方案,则将患者排除在外。主要观察指标是术后并发症,定义为出院后 6 周内发生切口感染或脓肿。符合纳入标准的 353 例患儿中,252 例(71%)接受 CTX/MTZ 治疗,其余患儿接受抗假单胞菌治疗方案。CTX/MTZ 组术后并发症发生率为 37 例(14.7%),抗假单胞菌组为 18 例(17.8%)。CTX/MTZ 组患儿抗生素相关并发症发生率为 4.4%,抗假单胞菌组为 6.9%(p=0.32)。在校正性别、年龄、种族和就诊前症状持续时间等因素的多变量逻辑回归模型中,接受抗假单胞菌抗生素治疗的患儿术后并发症的调整比值比为 1.25(95%置信区间 0.66-2.40)。接受 CTX/MTZ 与更广泛的抗生素治疗方案的患儿术后并发症发生率无差异。