• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)在儿科人群中的诊断性能:一项临床效果研究。

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.

Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jul;44(7):2377-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01975-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-019-01975-8
PMID:30874847
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for detecting biliary and pancreatic abnormalities in a pediatric population, using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval with a waiver of informed consent was obtained for this retrospective investigation. Records from the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Department of Radiology were used to identify patients aged ≤ 18 years who had undergone both ERCP and MRCP within a 4-week interval between January 2013 and May 2017. Biliary and pancreatic duct findings were documented for each modality to determine the diagnostic performance of MRCP (with 95% confidence intervals), using ERCP as the reference standard.

RESULTS

54 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean patient age at time of ERCP was 10.4 ± 4.9 years, and 25 (46%) were male. Mean interval between ERCP and MRCP was 11.2 ± 9.7 days. For detection of any abnormality (n = 99 ERCP findings), MRCP had a sensitivity of 76.8% (67.5-84.0%) and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81.7% (72.7-88.3%). MRCP was 75.7% (59.9-86.6%) sensitive, with a PPV of 84.9% (69.1-93.4%) for biliary findings (n = 37) and 73.5% (59.7-83.8%) sensitive, with a PPV of 78.3% (64.4-87.7%) for pancreatic findings (n = 49). For pancreatobiliary abnormalities (n = 13), MRCP had a sensitivity of 92.3% (66.7-99.6%) and a PPV of 85.7% (60.1-97.5%).

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, MRCP is moderately sensitive for biliary and pancreatic abnormalities, with false-negative and false-positive examinations being relatively common.

摘要

目的

通过内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)作为参考标准,确定磁共振胰胆管造影术(MRCP)在儿科人群中检测胆道和胰腺异常的诊断性能。

材料和方法

本回顾性研究获得了辛辛那提儿童医院医疗中心机构审查委员会的批准,并豁免了知情同意。使用辛辛那提儿童医院胃肠病学部和放射科的记录,确定了 2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 5 月期间,在 4 周内同时接受 ERCP 和 MRCP 的年龄≤18 岁的患者。记录每种方式的胆道和胰管发现,以确定以 ERCP 为参考标准的 MRCP(95%置信区间)的诊断性能。

结果

54 名患者符合纳入标准。ERCP 时患者的平均年龄为 10.4±4.9 岁,25 名(46%)为男性。ERCP 和 MRCP 之间的平均间隔为 11.2±9.7 天。对于任何异常(n=99 个 ERCP 结果)的检测,MRCP 的敏感性为 76.8%(67.5-84.0%),阳性预测值(PPV)为 81.7%(72.7-88.3%)。MRCP 对胆道异常的敏感性为 75.7%(59.9-86.6%),PPV 为 84.9%(69.1-93.4%)(n=37),对胰腺异常的敏感性为 73.5%(59.7-83.8%),PPV 为 78.3%(64.4-87.7%)(n=49)。对于胰胆管异常(n=13),MRCP 的敏感性为 92.3%(66.7-99.6%),PPV 为 85.7%(60.1-97.5%)。

结论

在临床实践中,MRCP 对胆道和胰腺异常具有中等敏感性,假阴性和假阳性检查相对常见。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)在儿科人群中的诊断性能:一项临床效果研究。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jul;44(7):2377-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01975-8.
2
Correlation between MRCP and ERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital.一家三级护理医院中磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)检查结果的相关性
W V Med J. 2010 Jul-Aug;106(5):14-9.
3
Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相比的临床意义。
Endoscopy. 1997 Mar;29(3):182-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004160.
4
[Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness].[磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP):诊断效用]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998 Apr;21(4):174-80.
5
[Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)在胆管和胰管诊断中的比较评估
Nihon Rinsho. 1998 Nov;56(11):2874-9.
6
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.内镜逆行胰胆管造影、胆管内超声检查及磁共振胰胆管造影在胆管狭窄中的应用:影像学诊断与组织病理学相关性的前瞻性比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1684-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30347.x.
7
The Diagnostic Yield of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Setting of Acute Pancreaticobiliary Disease - A Single Center Experience.磁共振胰胆管造影在急性胰胆疾病中的诊断价值——单中心经验
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2022 Feb;73(1):75-83. doi: 10.1177/08465371211013786. Epub 2021 May 24.
8
[Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)失败后促胰液素增强磁共振胰胆管造影(S-MRCP)的诊断价值
Orv Hetil. 2004 Mar 7;145(10):529-34.
9
MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature.磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)在胆道疾病评估中的比较:当前文献综述
J Dig Dis. 2008 Aug;9(3):162-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2008.00339.x.
10
Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.磁共振胰胆管造影在临床实践中的应用:不如我们曾经认为的那么好。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul;221(1):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.060. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
"Evaluation of hepatobiliary disorders using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in a low-resource setting in Kano, Nigeria: a retrospective study".在尼日利亚卡诺资源匮乏地区使用磁共振胰胆管造影术评估肝胆疾病:一项回顾性研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03811-4.
2
Utility of under-sampled scans with iterative reconstruction and high-frequency preserving transform for high spatial resolution magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.欠采样扫描结合迭代重建和高频保留变换在高空间分辨率磁共振胰胆管造影中的应用
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Mar;43(3):463-471. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01688-z. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
3
Application of imaging technology for the diagnosis of malignancy in the pancreaticobiliary duodenal junction (Review).
成像技术在胰胆管十二指肠交界处恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用(综述)
Oncol Lett. 2024 Oct 8;28(6):596. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14729. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Long-Term Follow-Up and Outcome of Pediatric Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Study.儿童急性胰腺炎的长期随访与转归:一项多中心研究
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2023 Jul;58(4):388-394. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2023.22261.
5
Comparison of propofol-nalbuphine and propofol-fentanyl sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.丙泊酚-纳布啡与丙泊酚-芬太尼用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术患者镇静的比较:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Feb 16;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01578-9.
6
Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography to Detect Benign and Malignant Biliary Strictures.磁共振胰胆管造影术检测良性和恶性胆管狭窄的诊断准确性
Adv Biomed Res. 2021 Nov 26;10:38. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_137_20. eCollection 2021.