Bopp Matthias, Mackenbach Johan P
Institut für Epidemiologie, Biostatistik und Prävention, Universität Zürich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zürich, Schweiz.
Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Niederlande.
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Mar;52(2):122-129. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01530-6. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
In 1989 the first international comparisons of mortality differences according to educational level and occupational status were published. A few years later systematic comparisons between European countries were initiated at the Erasmus University in Rotterdam. This became a trigger for several European Union (EU)-funded collaboration programs scrutinizing social inequalities in health. The collaboration revealed substantial differences in mortality within and between European populations.
This article provides a synthesis of the most important research results over the past 30 years and also identifies existing research gaps and potentials.
Descriptive summary of research results comparing European countries regarding male and female all-cause and cause-specific mortality according to educational level and occupational status.
In all European populations analyzed there was a consistent gradient with substantial and in part increasing advantages for higher socioeconomic status groups. There is, however, substantial variation between individual countries. This also applies to trends and cause of death-specific analyses. While relative differences have increased in virtually all populations, absolute differences have often decreased in many populations. Among women and in higher ages the relative differences were smaller. Within Europe, the southern countries had the smallest and the eastern countries the largest gradients. Tobacco and alcohol-related diseases had an especially noteworthy impact on trends and gradients.
The evidence for social health inequalities and their determinants has substantially improved during the past 30 years; however, there remains substantial potential for future research questions, for example concerning the contribution of the different phases of life to healthy aging.
1989年,首次发表了根据教育水平和职业地位进行的死亡率差异国际比较。几年后,鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学发起了欧洲国家之间的系统比较。这引发了几个由欧盟资助的合作项目,对健康方面的社会不平等进行审查。合作揭示了欧洲人群内部和之间在死亡率方面的巨大差异。
本文综合了过去30年最重要的研究结果,并确定了现有的研究差距和潜力。
对根据教育水平和职业地位比较欧洲国家男性和女性全因死亡率及特定原因死亡率的研究结果进行描述性总结。
在所有分析的欧洲人群中,社会经济地位较高的群体存在一致的梯度差异,且部分差异呈扩大趋势。然而,各国之间存在很大差异。这也适用于趋势和特定死因分析。虽然几乎所有人群中的相对差异都有所增加,但许多人群中的绝对差异往往有所减少。在女性和较高年龄段中,相对差异较小。在欧洲内部,南部国家的梯度差异最小,东部国家的梯度差异最大。烟草和酒精相关疾病对趋势和梯度差异有特别显著的影响。
在过去30年中,社会健康不平等及其决定因素的证据有了很大改善;然而,未来的研究问题仍有很大潜力,例如关于生命不同阶段对健康老龄化的贡献。