Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 E 70th St, Box 331, New York, NY 10021. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Mar;25(3):107-112.
Results of previous studies of Medicare beneficiaries have shown that more fragmented ambulatory care is associated with more emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions. Whether this observation is generalizable to Medicaid beneficiaries is unknown.
We conducted a 3-year retrospective cohort study in the 7-county Hudson Valley region of New York. We included 19,330 adult Medicaid beneficiaries who were continuously enrolled, were attributed to a primary care provider, and had 4 or more ambulatory visits in the baseline year.
We measured fragmentation using a modified Bice-Boxerman Index. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine associations between fragmentation score and ED visits or, separately, hospital admissions, adjusting for age, gender, and chronic conditions.
The average beneficiary had 15 ambulatory visits in the baseline year, spread across 5 providers, with the most frequently seen provider accounting for 48% of the visits. One-fourth of the sample had more than 20 ambulatory visits and more than 7 providers, with the most frequently seen provider accounting for fewer than 33% of visits. For every 0.1-point increase in fragmentation score, the adjusted hazard of an ED visit over 2 years of follow-up increased by 1.7% (95% CI, 0.5%-2.9%). Having more fragmented care was not associated with a change in the hazard of a hospital admission.
Among Medicaid beneficiaries, having more fragmented care was associated with a modest increase in the hazard of an ED visit, independent of chronic conditions. Fragmented ambulatory care may be modifiable and may represent a novel target for improvement.
先前针对 Medicare 受益人的研究结果表明,门诊医疗服务碎片化程度越高,急诊就诊次数和住院人数就越多。尚不清楚这一观察结果是否适用于 Medicaid 受益人群。
我们在纽约哈德逊河谷的 7 个县进行了一项为期 3 年的回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了 19330 名连续参保的成年 Medicaid 受益人群,他们有一个主要照护医生,并在基线年度有 4 次或以上的门诊就诊。
我们使用改良的 Bice-Boxerman 指数来衡量碎片化程度。使用 Cox 比例风险模型,调整年龄、性别和慢性疾病后,确定碎片化评分与急诊就诊或单独的住院就诊之间的关联。
每位受益人的基线年度平均有 15 次门诊就诊,分布在 5 名医生处,其中就诊最多的医生的就诊次数占 48%。四分之一的样本有超过 20 次门诊就诊和超过 7 名医生,其中就诊最多的医生的就诊次数不到 33%。碎片化评分每增加 0.1 分,随访 2 年期间急诊就诊的调整风险增加 1.7%(95%CI,0.5%-2.9%)。更碎片化的医疗服务与住院风险的变化无关。
在 Medicaid 受益人群中,与更碎片化的医疗服务相关的急诊就诊风险略有增加,这与慢性疾病无关。碎片化的门诊医疗服务可能是可以改变的,并且可能成为改善的新目标。