Suppr超能文献

不同种族的门诊医疗碎片化差异。

Differences in ambulatory care fragmentation by race.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 East 70th Street, Box 331, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06133-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

More fragmented ambulatory care (i.e., care spread across many providers without a dominant provider) has been associated with more subsequent healthcare utilization (such as more tests, procedures, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations) than less fragmented ambulatory care. It is not known if race and socioeconomic status are associated with fragmented ambulatory care.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal analysis of data from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, using the REGARDS baseline visit plus the first year of follow-up. We included participants ≥65 years old, who had linked fee-for-service Medicare claims, and ≥ 4 ambulatory visits in the first year of follow-up. We used Tobit regression to determine the associations between race, annual household income, and educational attainment at baseline and fragmentation score in the subsequent year (as measured with the reversed Bice-Boxerman Index). Covariates included other demographic characteristics, medical conditions, medication use, health behaviors, and psychosocial variables. Additional analyses categorized visits by the type of provider (primary care vs. specialist).

RESULTS

The study participants (N = 6799) had an average age of 73.0 years, 53% were female, and 30% were black. Nearly half had low annual household income (<$35,000) and 41% had a high school education or less. Overall, participants had a median of 10 ambulatory visits to 4 providers in the 12 months following their baseline study visit. Participants in the highest quintile of fragmentation scores had a median of 11 visits to 7 providers. Black race was associated with an absolute adjusted 3% lower fragmentation score compared to white race (95% confidence interval (2% lower to 4% lower; p < 0.001). This difference was explained by blacks seeing fewer specialists than whites. Income and education were not independent predictors of fragmentation scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Medicare beneficiaries, blacks had less fragmented ambulatory care than whites, due to lower utilization of specialty care. Future research is needed to determine the effect of fragmented care on health outcomes for blacks and whites.

摘要

背景

与较少碎片化的门诊护理相比,更多碎片化的门诊护理(即护理分散在多个提供者之间,没有主导提供者)与更多后续医疗保健利用(如更多测试、程序、急诊就诊和住院)相关。目前尚不清楚种族和社会经济地位是否与门诊护理碎片化有关。

方法

我们对 REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) 研究的数据进行了纵向分析,使用 REGARDS 基线访问加第一年随访。我们纳入了≥65 岁、有链接费用报销 Medicare 索赔和≥4 次在第一年随访中的门诊就诊的参与者。我们使用 Tobit 回归来确定基线时的种族、家庭年收入和教育程度与次年的碎片化评分之间的关联(通过反向 Bice-Boxerman 指数来衡量)。协变量包括其他人口统计学特征、医疗状况、药物使用、健康行为和社会心理变量。进一步的分析将就诊按提供者类型(初级保健与专科)进行分类。

结果

研究参与者(N=6799)的平均年龄为 73.0 岁,53%为女性,30%为黑人。近一半的人家庭年收入较低(<$35000),41%的人只有高中学历或以下。总体而言,参与者在基线研究访问后的 12 个月内中位数有 10 次门诊就诊,就诊于 4 个提供者。碎片化评分最高五分位的参与者中位数有 11 次就诊,就诊于 7 个提供者。与白人相比,黑人的碎片化评分绝对调整后低 3%(95%置信区间为 2%至 4%;p<0.001)。这种差异是由于黑人比白人就诊的专科医生更少。收入和教育程度不是碎片化评分的独立预测因素。

结论

在 Medicare 受益人群中,黑人的门诊护理碎片化程度低于白人,这是由于专科护理利用率较低所致。需要进一步研究以确定碎片化护理对黑人和白人健康结果的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a79/7890852/7665db224b90/12913_2021_6133_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验