McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-863. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy310.
Clinicians frequently pre-treat patients with amiodarone to increase the efficacy of electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF). Our objective was to determine the precise effects of amiodarone pre- and post-treatment on conversion efficacy and sinus rhythm maintenance.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing pre- and post-treatment for electrical cardioversion with amiodarone vs. no therapy on (i) acute restoration and (ii) maintenance of sinus rhythm after 1 year. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to July 2018 for randomized controlled trials. We evaluated the risk of bias for individual studies with the Cochrane tool and overall quality of evidence with the GRADE framework. We identified eight eligible studies (n = 1012). Five studies were deemed to have unclear or high risk of selection bias. We found the evidence to be of high quality based on GRADE. Treatment with amiodarone (200-800 mg daily for 1-6 weeks pre-cardioversion; 0-200 mg daily post-cardioversion) was associated with higher rates of acute restoration [relative risk (RR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.39, P = 0.004, n = 1012, I2 = 65%] and maintenance of sinus rhythm over 13 months (RR 4.39, 95% CI 2.99-6.45, P < 0.001, n = 695, I2 = 0%). The effects of amiodarone for acute restoration were maintained when considering only studies at low risk of bias (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.36, P < 0.001, n = 572, I2 = 0%). Adverse effects were typically non-serious, occurring in 3.4% (6/174) of subjects receiving amiodarone.
High-quality evidence demonstrated that treatment with amiodarone improved the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of AF. Short-term amiodarone was well-tolerated.
临床医生常常用胺碘酮对患者进行预治疗,以提高心房颤动(AF)电复律的疗效。我们的目的是确定胺碘酮预治疗和后治疗对电复律转换效果和窦性节律维持的确切影响。
我们对比较胺碘酮预治疗和后治疗与无治疗电复律对(i)急性恢复和(ii)1 年后窦性节律维持的试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们从开始到 2018 年 7 月在 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 上搜索了随机对照试验。我们使用 Cochrane 工具评估了个体研究的偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 框架评估了整体证据质量。我们确定了 8 项符合条件的研究(n=1012)。其中 5 项研究被认为存在选择偏倚的不明确或高风险。我们发现基于 GRADE 的证据质量很高。胺碘酮治疗(电复律前 1-6 周每天 200-800mg;电复律后每天 0-200mg)与更高的急性恢复率相关[相对风险(RR)1.22,95%置信区间(CI)1.07-1.39,P=0.004,n=1012,I2=65%]和 13 个月时窦性节律的维持(RR 4.39,95%CI 2.99-6.45,P<0.001,n=695,I2=0%)。当仅考虑低偏倚风险的研究时,胺碘酮对急性恢复的影响仍然存在(RR 1.22,95%CI 1.10-1.36,P<0.001,n=572,I2=0%)。不良反应通常不严重,在接受胺碘酮治疗的 174 名受试者中,有 3.4%(6/174)发生。
高质量的证据表明,胺碘酮治疗可改善 AF 电复律后的恢复和窦性节律的维持。短期胺碘酮耐受性良好。