Suppr超能文献

早期与延迟切除及植皮对深度烧伤手部功能恢复的影响:一项双盲、随机平行临床试验

Effects of Early Versus Delayed Excision and Grafting on Restoring the Functionality of Deep Burn-Injured Hands: A Double-Blind, Randomized Parallel Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Ayaz Mehdi, Karami Mohammad Yasin, Deilami Iman, Moradzadeh Zahra

机构信息

Division of Burn and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shiraz, Iran.

Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2019 Jun 21;40(4):451-456. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz033.

Abstract

Hand burns have major impacts on daily activities. An interdisciplinary and multifaceted approach is necessary to effectively treat these burns. Generally, hands are common sites for burn injuries. It is known that Early Excision and Grafting (EEG) of deep burn wounds can decrease scar and subsequent contracture formation compared with Delayed Excision and Grafting (DEG) method. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare the effects of these procedures on function of hands with deep burns, by using the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ). In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, we evaluated a total of 50 patients (age range: 15-70 years) with deep second-degree burns of both hands from January 2013 to December 2015. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups, treatment (EEG) and control (DEG) groups (25 patients per group). They followed up postoperatively for 3 months. MHQ was completed for each of them to determine the function of the hands, pain sensation, limitation of daily activities, overall satisfaction, and cosmetic appearance during follow-up. Data were analyzed in the groups using SPSS version 16. Baseline characteristics of the groups were matched. In early postoperation, hand functions and daily activities, gross appearance, and pain sensation were better in EEG group. After 1 and 3 months, no significant difference was detected between the groups except for patient satisfaction which was better in EEG group. Also, EEG group was associated with a significant shorter hospital stay and lower treatment costs compared with DEG group. Graft take rate was similar in both groups. EEG is recognized as the standard treatment for deep skin burns, but we did not find any significant difference between effects of EEG and DEG on hand functions although EEG group had shorter hospital stay and lower treatment costs compared with DEG. The main goal of treatment of hand burns is restoration of the hand functions. Based on our findings, hand function was not related to the type of surgery. Also, as all wounds in both surgical groups healed less than 3 weeks, the authors suggest that the excision time limit could be change in our burn center from 10 days to 2 to 3 weeks when we use sheet graft as for hands.

摘要

手部烧伤对日常活动有重大影响。采用跨学科、多方面的方法来有效治疗这些烧伤是必要的。一般来说,手部是烧伤的常见部位。众所周知,与延迟切除与植皮(DEG)方法相比,深度烧伤创面的早期切除与植皮(EEG)可减少瘢痕及后续挛缩的形成。因此,本研究旨在通过使用密歇根手部问卷(MHQ)比较这些手术方法对深度烧伤手部功能的影响。在这项双盲随机临床试验中,我们评估了2013年1月至2015年12月期间共50例(年龄范围:15 - 70岁)双手深二度烧伤的患者。受试者被随机分为两组,治疗组(EEG)和对照组(DEG)(每组25例患者)。术后对他们进行了3个月的随访。为他们每个人完成MHQ以确定随访期间手部的功能、疼痛感觉、日常活动受限情况、总体满意度和外观。使用SPSS 16版对两组数据进行分析。两组的基线特征相匹配。术后早期,EEG组的手部功能、日常活动、总体外观和疼痛感觉更好。1个月和3个月后,除了EEG组患者满意度更高外,两组之间未检测到显著差异。此外,与DEG组相比,EEG组的住院时间明显更短,治疗费用更低。两组的植皮成活率相似。EEG被认为是深度皮肤烧伤的标准治疗方法,但我们未发现EEG和DEG对手部功能的影响有任何显著差异,尽管EEG组与DEG组相比住院时间更短、治疗费用更低。手部烧伤治疗的主要目标是恢复手部功能。基于我们的研究结果,手部功能与手术类型无关。此外,由于两个手术组的所有伤口均在3周内愈合,作者建议当我们对手部使用片状植皮时,我们烧伤中心的切除时间限制可从10天改为2至3周。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验