Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Brain Res. 2019 Jul 1;1714:227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
Environmental enrichment (EE) and amantadine (AMT) enhance motor and cognitive outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there are no data on the effects of combining these two therapies. Hence, the aim of the current study was to combine EE and AMT after TBI to determine if their net effect further enhances motor and cognitive performance. Anesthetized adult male rats received either a cortical impact of moderate severity or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing and once daily administration of AMT (20 mg/kg; i.p.) or saline vehicle (VEH, 1 mL/kg; i.p.) beginning 24 h after injury for 19 days. Motor and cognitive function were assessed on post-surgical days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. There were no statistical differences among the sham groups regardless of therapy, so the data were pooled. EE, AMT, and their combination (EE + AMT) improved beam-balance, but only EE and EE + AMT enhanced beam-walking. All three treatment paradigms improved spatial learning and memory relative to the VEH-treated STD controls (p < 0.05). No differences were revealed between the EE groups, regardless of treatment, but both were better than the AMT-treated STD group on beam-walking and spatial learning (p < 0.05). Both EE groups equally reduced cortical lesion volume relative to the STD-housed AMT and VEH groups (p < 0.05). The results indicate that although beneficial on their own, EE + AMT do not provide additional benefits after TBI. It is important to note that the lack of additive effects using the current treatment and behavioral protocols does not detract from the benefits of each individual therapy. The findings provide insight for future combination studies.
环境丰富(EE)和金刚烷胺(AMT)可改善实验性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的运动和认知结果。然而,目前尚无关于联合使用这两种疗法的效果的数据。因此,本研究的目的是在 TBI 后联合使用 EE 和 AMT,以确定它们的净效应是否进一步增强运动和认知表现。麻醉的成年雄性大鼠接受中度严重程度的皮质撞击或假损伤,然后随机分配到 EE 或标准(STD)饲养,并在损伤后 24 小时开始每天接受 AMT(20mg/kg;腹腔注射)或盐水载体(VEH,1mL/kg;腹腔注射)治疗,共 19 天。术后第 1-5 天和第 14-19 天分别评估运动和认知功能。第 21 天定量皮质损伤体积。无论治疗如何,假损伤组之间均无统计学差异,因此将数据合并。EE、AMT 及其组合(EE+AMT)改善了平衡木行走,但只有 EE 和 EE+AMT 改善了平衡木行走。所有三种治疗方案均改善了空间学习和记忆,与 VEH 处理的 STD 对照相比(p<0.05)。无论治疗如何,EE 组之间均无差异,但在平衡木行走和空间学习方面,两者均优于 AMT 处理的 STD 组(p<0.05)。与 STD 饲养的 AMT 和 VEH 组相比,EE 两组均同等降低了皮质损伤体积(p<0.05)。结果表明,尽管单独使用有益,但 EE+AMT 在 TBI 后没有提供额外的益处。需要注意的是,当前治疗和行为方案中缺乏累加效应并不影响每种单独治疗的益处。这些发现为未来的联合研究提供了思路。