Department of Rheumatology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Psychiatric Research Center, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Daru. 2019 Jun;27(1):149-158. doi: 10.1007/s40199-019-00257-4. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
Duloxetine and pregabalin are among the most widely used medications in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FM).
To add to the very few lines of evidence that exist on the comparative safety and efficacy of these two medications.
In this open-label randomized clinical trial, outpatient women, who were diagnosed with FM based on American College of Rheumatology 2010 criteria, and had an age range of 18-65 years old were assigned to either duloxetine 30-60 mg or pregabalin 75-150 mg per day for 4 weeks. Patients were excluded in cases of having used duloxetine, pregabalin, gabapentin, or antidepressants within 12 weeks prior to the study, having had a history of comorbid medical conditions that could provoke chronic pain, or having had comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders, except for major depressive/anxiety disorders. Primary outcomes were between-group differences in mean score changes from baseline to end point for Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and Beck Depression Inventory-II. Secondary outcomes were the same statistical estimates, but for Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised and 12-Item Short Form Survey. Descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test were the main methods of analysis. ( www.irct.ir ; IRCT2016030626935N1).
Among all the scales, only WPI scores improved with a statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms, favoring duloxetine (Mean difference in score change - 2.32, 95% CI, -4.46 to - 0.18; p = 0.034; Cohen's d 0.53 95% CI, 0.04 to 1.02). Drop out rate and cumulative incidence of nausea was significantly higher in the duloxetine arm compared to the pregabalin arm.
This study provides further evidence on higher efficacy of duloxetine compared to pregabalin for the treatment of pain in patients with fibromyalgia. Future comprehensive pragmatic clinical trials are warranted.
度洛西汀和普瑞巴林是治疗纤维肌痛综合征(FM)患者最常用的药物之一。
增加关于这两种药物相对安全性和疗效的极少数证据。
在这项开放标签随机临床试验中,符合美国风湿病学会 2010 年标准诊断为 FM 的门诊女性患者,年龄在 18-65 岁之间,每天分配接受度洛西汀 30-60mg 或普瑞巴林 75-150mg,为期 4 周。排除在研究前 12 周内使用过度洛西汀、普瑞巴林、加巴喷丁或抗抑郁药、有引起慢性疼痛的合并医学疾病史或有合并神经精神疾病史(除重度抑郁/焦虑障碍外)的患者。主要结局是从基线到终点时广泛性疼痛指数(WPI)和贝克抑郁量表-II的组间平均评分变化差异。次要结局是相同的统计估计,但针对纤维肌痛影响问卷修订版和 12 项简短健康调查问卷。主要分析方法是描述性统计和独立样本 t 检验。(www.irct.ir;IRCT2016030626935N1)。
在所有量表中,只有 WPI 评分有所改善,两组之间有统计学显著差异,度洛西汀更优(评分变化的平均差异-2.32,95%CI,-4.46 至-0.18;p=0.034;Cohen's d 0.53,95%CI,0.04 至 1.02)。与普瑞巴林组相比,度洛西汀组的停药率和恶心的累积发生率显著更高。
本研究进一步证明了度洛西汀在治疗纤维肌痛患者疼痛方面比普瑞巴林更有效。需要进行未来的全面实用临床试验。