Suppr超能文献

阿米替林与美国食品药品监督管理局批准的纤维肌痛治疗药物的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparison of Amitriptyline and US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Treatments for Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Colombia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212939. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12939.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Amitriptyline is an established medication used off-label for the treatment of fibromyalgia, but pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran are the only pharmacological agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the comparative effectiveness and acceptability associated with pharmacological treatment options for fibromyalgia.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov were conducted on November 20, 2018, and updated on July 29, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing amitriptyline or any FDA-approved doses of investigated drugs.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

This study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. Four independent reviewers extracted data using a standardized data extraction sheet and assessed quality of RCTs. A random-effects bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted. Data were analyzed from August 2020 to January 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Comparative effectiveness and acceptability (defined as discontinuation of treatment owing to adverse drug reactions) associated with amitriptyline (off-label), pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran (on-label) in reducing fibromyalgia symptoms. The following doses were compared: 60-mg and 120-mg duloxetine; 150-mg, 300-mg, 450-mg, and 600-mg pregabalin; 100-mg and 200-mg milnacipran; and amitriptyline. Effect sizes are reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs). Findings were considered statistically significant when the 95% CrI did not include the null value (0 for SMD and 1 for OR). Relative treatment ranking using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies (11 930 patients) were included. The mean (SD) age of patients was 48.4 (10.4) years, and 11 261 patients (94.4%) were women. Compared with placebo, amitriptyline was associated with reduced sleep disturbances (SMD, -0.97; 95% CrI, -1.10 to -0.83), fatigue (SMD, -0.64; 95% CrI, -0.75 to -0.53), and improved quality of life (SMD, -0.80; 95% CrI, -0.94 to -0.65). Duloxetine 120 mg was associated with the highest improvement in pain (SMD, -0.33; 95% CrI, -0.36 to -0.30) and depression (SMD, -0.25; 95% CrI, -0.32 to -0.17) vs placebo. All treatments were associated with inferior acceptability (higher dropout rate) than placebo, except amitriptyline (OR, 0.78; 95% CrI, 0.31 to 1.66). According to the SUCRA-based relative ranking of treatments, duloxetine 120 mg was associated with higher efficacy for treating pain and depression, while amitriptyline was associated with higher efficacy for improving sleep, fatigue, and overall quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that clinicians should consider how treatments could be tailored to individual symptoms, weighing the benefits and acceptability, when prescribing medications to patients with fibromyalgia.

摘要

重要性

阿米替林是一种已被广泛使用的药物,可用于治疗纤维肌痛症,但是普瑞巴林、度洛西汀和米那普仑是美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗纤维肌痛症的唯一药理学药物。

目的

研究纤维肌痛症治疗方案中药物治疗选择的相对有效性和可接受性。

数据来源

于 2018 年 11 月 20 日在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和 Clinicaltrials.gov 上进行了搜索,并于 2020 年 7 月 29 日进行了更新。

研究选择

比较阿米替林或任何经 FDA 批准的研究药物剂量的随机临床试验(RCT)。

数据提取和综合

本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目准则。四位独立评审员使用标准化数据提取表提取数据,并评估 RCT 的质量。进行了随机效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)。数据的分析时间为 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 1 月。

主要结果和措施

与阿米替林(非标签)、普瑞巴林、度洛西汀和米那普仑(标签)相关的比较有效性和可接受性(定义为因药物不良反应而停止治疗),以减轻纤维肌痛症状。比较了以下剂量:度洛西汀 60mg 和 120mg;普瑞巴林 150mg、300mg、450mg 和 600mg;米那普仑 100mg 和 200mg;以及阿米替林。连续结果以标准化均数差(SMD)表示,二分类结果以比值比(OR)表示,置信区间(95%CrI)为 95%。当 95%CrI 不包括零值(SMD 为 0,OR 为 1)时,认为发现具有统计学意义。还评估了基于累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)的相对治疗排名。

结果

共纳入 36 项研究(11930 名患者)。患者的平均(SD)年龄为 48.4(10.4)岁,11930 名患者(94.4%)为女性。与安慰剂相比,阿米替林与睡眠障碍(SMD,-0.97;95%CrI,-1.10 至-0.83)、疲劳(SMD,-0.64;95%CrI,-0.75 至-0.53)和生活质量(SMD,-0.80;95%CrI,-0.94 至-0.65)改善相关。度洛西汀 120mg 与疼痛(SMD,-0.33;95%CrI,-0.36 至-0.30)和抑郁(SMD,-0.25;95%CrI,-0.32 至-0.17)的改善程度最高。与安慰剂相比,所有治疗方法的可接受性(较高的停药率)均较差,除阿米替林(OR,0.78;95%CrI,0.31 至 1.66)外。根据基于 SUCRA 的治疗相对排名,度洛西汀 120mg 与疼痛和抑郁的治疗效果更高,而阿米替林与睡眠、疲劳和整体生活质量的改善效果更高。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,临床医生在为纤维肌痛症患者开处方时,应考虑如何根据个体症状调整治疗方法,权衡治疗效果和可接受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc27/9121190/a4d5b8ddaa44/jamanetwopen-e2212939-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验