Suppr超能文献

一项关于阴道环预防HIV依从性和可接受性的混合方法研究:MTN - 027的行为学结果

A Mixed-Methods Study Examining Adherence to and Acceptability of Intravaginal Rings for HIV Prevention: Behavioral Results of MTN-027.

作者信息

Bauermeister José A, Golinkoff Jesse M, Carballo-Diéguez Alex, Giguere Rebecca, López Daniela, Hoesley Craig J, Chen Beatrice A, Anderson Peter, Dezzutti Charlene S, Strizki Julie, Sprinkle Carol, Heard Faye, Hall Wayne, Jacobson Cindy, Berthiaume Jennifer, Mayo Ashley, Richardson Barbra A, Piper Jeanna

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Blvd., Suite 222L, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2020 Feb;24(2):607-616. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02457-0.

Abstract

Intravaginal rings (IVR) containing antiretroviral drugs are a promising method for HIV prevention. We triangulated quantitative and qualitative assessments to evaluate the acceptability of four IVRs used continuously for 28 days as part of a Phase I trial (N = 48 HIV-negative women; ages 18-45). Adherence was high throughout the trial, yet 30% of participants reported involuntary IVR expulsions followed by re-insertion. Most participants (93.6%) felt comfortable with the IVR being inside their body. Participants reported liking the IVR more (36.2%) or the same amount (55.3%) since starting the study. When given the option of choosing between the IVR and/or a male condom for HIV-prevention, most reported preferring the IVR (n = 29, 63.0%), and over a quarter of the sample reported liking them equally (n = 12, 26.1%). We observed no differences in IVR acceptability across the study arms. High adherence and acceptability underscores the promise of an IVR as a female-controlled, sustained mechanism for HIV prevention.

摘要

含有抗逆转录病毒药物的阴道环(IVR)是一种很有前景的HIV预防方法。作为一项I期试验的一部分(N = 48名HIV阴性女性;年龄18 - 45岁),我们采用定量和定性评估相结合的方法,来评估连续使用28天的四种阴道环的可接受性。在整个试验过程中依从性很高,但30%的参与者报告有阴道环非自愿排出并随后重新插入的情况。大多数参与者(93.6%)对阴道环在体内的情况感觉舒适。自开始研究以来,更多参与者(36.2%)或同等比例(55.3%)的参与者表示更喜欢阴道环。当被问及在阴道环和/或男用避孕套之间选择用于HIV预防时,大多数人报告更喜欢阴道环(n = 29,63.0%),超过四分之一的样本报告同样喜欢两者(n = 12,26.1%)。我们观察到各研究组在阴道环可接受性方面没有差异。高依从性和可接受性凸显了阴道环作为一种女性可控的、持续的HIV预防机制的前景。

相似文献

10
Acceptability and adherence: findings from a Phase II study of a candidate vaginal microbicide, 'Praneem polyherbal tablet', in Pune, India.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Jun;104(6):412-5. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.12.007. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferred product attributes of a multipurpose vaginal ring: Findings from a phase 1 trial.
Front Reprod Health. 2023 Mar 30;5:1148134. doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1148134. eCollection 2023.
3
Users' Preferred Characteristics of Vaginal Rings for HIV Prevention: A Qualitative Analysis of Two Phase I Trials.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2022 Apr;38(4):313-326. doi: 10.1089/AID.2021.0077. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
4
Acceptability and Preference for 3-Month Versus 1-Month Vaginal Rings for HIV-1 Risk Reduction Among Participants in a Phase 1 Trial.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Jul;31(7):1029-1039. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0121. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
5
Vaginal ring acceptability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal ring experiences from around the world.
Contraception. 2022 Feb;106:16-33. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
6
Topical delivery of long-acting antiretrovirals to prevent HIV acquisition.
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2020 Jan;15(1):42-48. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000598.

本文引用的文献

3
Phase 1 Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of MK-2048/Vicriviroc (MK-4176)/MK-2048A Intravaginal Rings.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 19;68(7):1136-1143. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy653.
8
Acceptability and use of a dapivirine vaginal ring in a phase III trial.
AIDS. 2017 May 15;31(8):1159-1167. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001452.
9
Safety and Efficacy of a Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV Prevention in Women.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 1;375(22):2133-2143. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602046.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验