Shilovsky G A, Putyatina T S, Ashapkin V V, Rozina A A, Lyubetsky V A, Minina E P, Bychkovskaia I B, Markov A V, Skulachev V P
Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Biology, Moscow, 119234, Russia.
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2018 Dec;83(12):1489-1503. doi: 10.1134/S0006297918120076.
Social insects with identical genotype that form castes with radically different lifespans are a promising model system for studying the mechanisms underlying longevity. The main direction of progressive evolution of social insects, in particular, ants, is the development of the social way of life inextricably linked with the increase in the colony size. Only in a large colony, it is possible to have a developed polyethism, create large food reserves, and actively regulate the nest microclimate. The lifespan of ants hugely varies among genetically similar queens, workers (unproductive females), and males. The main advantage of studies on insects is the determinism of ontogenetic processes, with a single genome leading to completely different lifespans in different castes. This high degree of determinacy is precisely the reason why some researchers (incorrectly) call a colony of ants the "superorganism", emphasizing the fact that during the development, depending on the community needs, ants can switch their ontogenetic programs, which influences their social roles, ability to learn (i.e., the brain [mushroom-like body] plasticity), and, respectively, the spectrum of tasks performed by a given individual. It has been shown that in many types of food behavior, older ants surpass young ones in both performing the tasks and transferring the experience. The balance between the need to reduce the "cost" of non-breeding individuals (short lifespan and small size of workers) and the benefit from experienced long-lived workers possessing useful skills (large size and "non-aging") apparently determines the differences in the lifespan and aging rate of workers in different species of ants. A large spectrum of rigidly determined ontogenetic trajectories in different castes with identical genomes and the possibility of comparison between "evolutionarily advanced" and "primitive" subfamilies (e.g., Formicinae and Ponerinae) make ants an attractive object in the studies of both normal aging and effects of anti-aging drugs.
具有相同基因型却形成寿命截然不同的等级群体的群居昆虫,是研究长寿潜在机制的一个很有前景的模型系统。群居昆虫,尤其是蚂蚁,渐进进化的主要方向是发展与群体规模扩大紧密相连的社会生活方式。只有在大型群体中,才有可能形成发达的多型现象,建立大量食物储备,并积极调节巢穴小气候。在基因相似的蚁后、工蚁(无生殖能力的雌性)和雄蚁中,蚂蚁的寿命差异极大。对昆虫进行研究的主要优势在于个体发育过程的确定性,即单一基因组在不同等级群体中会导致截然不同的寿命。正是这种高度的确定性,使得一些研究者(错误地)将蚁群称为“超个体”,强调在发育过程中,蚂蚁能够根据群体需求切换其个体发育程序,这会影响它们的社会角色、学习能力(即大脑[蕈形体]可塑性),进而影响特定个体所执行的任务范围。研究表明,在许多类型的觅食行为中,年长的蚂蚁在执行任务和传递经验方面都超过年轻蚂蚁。减少非繁殖个体“成本”(工蚁寿命短且体型小)的需求与拥有有用技能的经验丰富的长寿工蚁所带来的益处(体型大且“不衰老”)之间的平衡,显然决定了不同种类蚂蚁中工蚁寿命和衰老速率的差异。在具有相同基因组的不同等级群体中存在大量严格确定的个体发育轨迹,以及能够在“进化上先进”和“原始”亚科(如蚁亚科和猛蚁亚科)之间进行比较,这使得蚂蚁成为研究正常衰老和抗衰老药物效果的一个有吸引力的对象。