Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Torrance, California.
Department of Biostatistics, George Washington University, Rockville, Maryland.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 2):1341-1349. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
This study sought to determine the relationship between coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in DCCT (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial)/EDIC (Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications) participants.
The CAC score has been validated for improved risk stratification in general populations; however, this association has not been well studied in type 1 diabetes (T1DM).
Computed tomography (CT) to measure CAC was performed in 1,205 DCCT/EDIC participants at a mean of 42.8 years of age during EDIC years 7 to 9, after the end of DCCT. This study analyzed the association between CAC and time to the first subsequent CVD event or to the first major adverse cardiac event (MACE), a follow-up of 10 to 13 years. CAC was categorized as: 0, >0 to 100, >100 to 300, or >300 Agatston units.
Of 1,156 participants at risk for subsequent CVD, 105 had an initial CVD event (8.5 per 1,000 patient-years); and of 1,187 participants at risk for MACE, 51 had an initial MACE event (3.9 per 1,000 patient-years). Event rates among those with scores of zero (n = 817 [70.7%]) were very low for CVD (5.6 per 1,000 patient years). CAC scores >100 to 300 (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.17, 5.40) and >300 (HR: 6.06, 6.91) were associated with higher risks of CVD and MACE, respectively, compared to CAC of 0 (p < 0.0001). CAC scores >0 to 100 were nominally associated with CVD (HR: 1.71; p = 0.0415) but not with MACE (HR: 1.11; p = 0.8134). Similar results were observed when also adjusted for mean HbA and conventional CVD risk factors. The increment in the AUC due to CAC was modest.
CAC scores >100 Agatston units were significantly associated with an increased risk of the subsequent occurrence of CVD and MACE in DCCT/EDIC cohort. (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial [DCCT]; NCT00360815; Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications [EDIC]; NCT00360893).
本研究旨在探讨冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分与 DCCT(糖尿病控制和并发症试验)/EDIC(糖尿病干预和并发症的流行病学)参与者随后发生心血管疾病(CVD)事件之间的关系。
CAC 评分已被验证可改善一般人群的风险分层;然而,在 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)中,这种关联尚未得到很好的研究。
在 EDIC 第 7 至 9 年期间,即 DCCT 结束后,1,205 名 DCCT/EDIC 参与者进行了计算机断层扫描(CT)以测量 CAC,平均年龄为 42.8 岁。本研究分析了 CAC 与首次随后 CVD 事件或首次主要不良心脏事件(MACE)之间的时间关系,随访时间为 10 至 13 年。CAC 分为:0、>0 至 100、>100 至 300、或>300 阿加斯顿单位。
在有发生 CVD 风险的 1,156 名参与者中,有 105 名发生了初始 CVD 事件(每 1,000 名患者年 8.5 例);在有发生 MACE 风险的 1,187 名参与者中,有 51 名发生了初始 MACE 事件(每 1,000 名患者年 3.9 例)。CAC 评分为零(n=817[70.7%])的患者发生 CVD 的发生率非常低(每 1,000 患者年 5.6 例)。CAC 评分>100 至 300(HR:4.17,5.40)和>300(HR:6.06,6.91)与 CVD 和 MACE 的风险增加分别相关,与 CAC 评分为 0 相比(p<0.0001)。CAC 评分>0 至 100 与 CVD 呈名义相关(HR:1.71;p=0.0415),但与 MACE 无关(HR:1.11;p=0.8134)。当也调整平均 HbA 和传统 CVD 危险因素时,也观察到类似的结果。由于 CAC 导致 AUC 的增加幅度较小。
CAC 评分>100 阿加斯顿单位与 DCCT/EDIC 队列中随后发生 CVD 和 MACE 的风险增加显著相关。(糖尿病控制和并发症试验 [DCCT];NCT00360815;糖尿病干预和并发症的流行病学 [EDIC];NCT00360893)。