Health Services Research, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Health Services Research, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.042. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
Patient choice of provider and provider competition have been introduced with the claim that they would lead to improved quality. For this to occur, certain conditions must be fulfilled on both the demand and the supply side. However, supply side-mechanisms - with provider behaviour as central - have been largely neglected in the literature, especially in primary care markets. In this article, we focus on provider behaviour and explore if and how choice and competition function as quality enhancing drivers in Swedish primary care. We explore this through semi-structured interviews with 24 managers and physicians at 13 Swedish primary healthcare centres, conducted from May 2016 to February 2017. The analysis draws on assumptions that for enhanced quality, providers must receive information on patients' choices, analyse it and respond accordingly. One conclusion is that Swedish primary care providers lack information on patients' choices and 'exits', which makes it difficult for providers to respond to patients' choices. Furthermore, it is questionable whether choice and competition stimulate enhanced clinical quality. At the same time, choice and competition seems to make providers more aware of accessibility concerns and of their reputation, which they may be stimulated to improve. The article contributes evidence on supply side-mechanisms, and encourages clarification of 'quality' in this respect, both on the political arena as well as in theoretical models.
患者对提供者的选择和提供者之间的竞争已经被引入,声称它们将提高质量。为了实现这一点,供需双方都必须满足某些条件。然而,供应方的机制——以提供者的行为为中心——在文献中被大大忽视了,尤其是在初级保健市场。在本文中,我们专注于提供者的行为,并探讨在瑞典初级保健中,选择和竞争是否以及如何作为提高质量的驱动因素发挥作用。我们通过对 2016 年 5 月至 2017 年 2 月在瑞典 13 个初级保健中心的 24 名经理和医生进行半结构化访谈来探索这一点。分析基于这样的假设:为了提高质量,提供者必须收到关于患者选择的信息,对其进行分析,并做出相应的回应。结论之一是,瑞典初级保健提供者缺乏关于患者选择和“退出”的信息,这使得提供者难以对患者的选择做出回应。此外,选择和竞争是否会刺激临床质量的提高也值得怀疑。同时,选择和竞争似乎使提供者更加关注可及性问题和声誉,他们可能会受到激励来改善这些问题。本文提供了关于供应方机制的证据,并鼓励在政治领域和理论模型中澄清这方面的“质量”问题。