Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Hereweg 80, 9725 AG, Groningen, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, the Netherlands; University Medical Center Groningen, Rob Giel Research Center, P.O. 30.0001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
VU University Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BR, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Mental Health research institute, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BR, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychosis Research, Zoutkeetsingel 40, 2512 HN, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Sep;279:295-305. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effects of different types of physical exercise (PE) on negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients. Mind-body exercise (MBE), aerobic exercise (AE) and resistance training (RT) will be investigated.
The Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO were searched from their inception until April 26, 2018. Randomized controlled trials comparing PE with any control group in patients with schizophrenia were included when negative symptoms had been assessed. This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool. Moderator, sensitivity, and meta regression analyses were conducted to explore causes of heterogeneity and impact of study quality.
We included 22 studies (N = 1249). The overall methodological quality was poor. The meta-analysis (random effects model) showed a medium significant effect in favor of any PE intervention (Hedges' g = 0.434, 95% CI = 0.196-0.671) versus any control condition. MBE and AE respectively showed a medium significant effect (Hedges' g = 0.461) and a small significant effect (Hedges' g = 0.341) versus any control condition. The effect of RT could not be examined. The overall heterogeneity was high (I = 76%) and could not be reduced with moderator or sensitivity analyses.
This meta-analysis demonstrated that PE could be a promising intervention in the treatment of negative symptoms. However, the quality of the included studies was low and heterogeneity was high, which makes it impossible to make a clear recommendation. Therefore, results should be interpreted with care.
本荟萃分析旨在评估不同类型的身体锻炼(PE)对精神分裂症患者阴性症状的影响。将研究身心锻炼(MBE)、有氧运动(AE)和抗阻训练(RT)。
从建库至 2018 年 4 月 26 日,检索 Cochrane 图书馆、Medline、Embase 和 PsycINFO。纳入比较 PE 与任何精神分裂症患者对照组的随机对照试验,且评估了阴性症状。本荟萃分析按照 PRISMA 指南进行。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。进行了调节、敏感性和荟萃回归分析,以探讨异质性的原因和研究质量的影响。
我们纳入了 22 项研究(N=1249)。整体方法学质量较差。荟萃分析(随机效应模型)显示,任何 PE 干预(Hedges'g=0.434,95%CI=0.196-0.671)与任何对照条件相比,具有中等显著效果。MBE 和 AE 分别与任何对照条件相比,具有中等显著效果(Hedges'g=0.461)和小显著效果(Hedges'g=0.341)。RT 的效果无法检测。整体异质性较高(I=76%),且无法通过调节或敏感性分析降低。
本荟萃分析表明,PE 可能是治疗阴性症状的一种有前途的干预措施。然而,纳入研究的质量较低,异质性较高,因此无法做出明确的推荐。因此,结果应谨慎解释。