Human-Centric Design Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Human-Centric Design Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Med Eng Phys. 2019 May;67:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
Finite element (FE) method has been widely used to study the screw-bone connections. Screw threads are often excluded from the FE spine model to reduce computational cost. However, no study has been conducted to compare the effect of such simplification in the screw models on the predicting accuracy of the model. The effects of different screw-bone connection types on the overall spine biomechanics are also unknown. In this study, three different types of screw-bone connections were compared using FE simulations in this study: (1) screw and bone are not fully bonded (contact connection); (2) screw is rigidly bonded with the bone (bonded connection); and (3) simplified-geometry-rigid (SGR) connection. Screw pullout test and physiological spinal loading test were simulated for the screws in this study: (1) pullout test where the pedicle screws were inserted in polyurethane foam; and (2) physiological spinal loading test (flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation) where the screws were fused into previously-validated FE lumbar spine model. The FE spine model used in this study included L-L spine levels and simulated major ligaments and resultant muscle forces. This study indicated that the holding capability in the screw-bone interaction is smaller and the bone and implants are subjected to larger von Mises stress (up to 44.88%) in the contact connection than those in the bonded connection. Among the four spinal loading cases tested in this study, flexion produced the highest von Mises stress in both the bone and the implants. Considerable differences were observed between simplified and non-simplified screw FE models in the von Mises stress at screw-bone contact region within spinal loading environment and the ultimate screw pullout strength in pullout test. This study concluded that both the spinal implants and the bone are subjected to higher stress immediately after the pedicle-screw-instrumented surgery and before the screw and bone are fully bonded. The screw-bone interface is less likely to fail after the screw and bone are fully bonded. SGR screw model is able to predict screw force and rod stress that are consistent with those predicted by non-simplified screw models.
有限元(FE)方法已广泛用于研究螺钉-骨连接。为了降低计算成本,螺钉螺纹通常被排除在 FE 脊柱模型之外。然而,目前还没有研究比较这种简化的螺钉模型对模型预测精度的影响。不同的螺钉-骨连接类型对整体脊柱生物力学的影响也尚不清楚。在这项研究中,使用有限元模拟比较了三种不同类型的螺钉-骨连接:(1)螺钉和骨未完全结合(接触连接);(2)螺钉与骨刚性结合(刚性连接);(3)简化几何形状刚性(SGR)连接。本研究模拟了螺钉的螺钉拔出试验和生理脊柱加载试验:(1)将椎弓根螺钉插入聚氨酯泡沫中的拔出试验;(2)将螺钉融合到先前验证的 FE 腰椎模型中的生理脊柱加载试验(屈伸、侧屈和轴向旋转)。本研究中使用的 FE 脊柱模型包括 L-L 脊柱水平和模拟的主要韧带以及产生的肌肉力。这项研究表明,在接触连接中,螺钉-骨相互作用的保持能力较小,骨和植入物承受的 von Mises 应力(高达 44.88%)大于刚性连接。在本研究测试的四种脊柱加载情况下,屈伸产生的骨和植入物的 von Mises 应力最高。在脊柱加载环境下,简化和非简化螺钉 FE 模型之间在螺钉-骨接触区域的 von Mises 应力以及拔出试验中的最终螺钉拔出强度方面存在显著差异。本研究得出结论,在椎弓根螺钉植入手术后和螺钉与骨完全结合之前,脊柱植入物和骨都会承受更高的应力。螺钉与骨完全结合后,螺钉-骨界面不太可能失效。SGR 螺钉模型能够预测与非简化螺钉模型一致的螺钉力和杆应力。