Conrad Eric J, Becker Mikaela, Brandley Elizabeth, Saksvig Emilie, Nickelson Jen
1 California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA, USA.
2 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2019 Sep;20(5):730-741. doi: 10.1177/1524839919837619. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
Understanding the advocacy and public policy training needs of our future health promotion workforce is crucial if we are to prepare them to meet their professional responsibilities. The purpose of this study was to examine health promotion students' advocacy/public policy involvement, training, and perceptions. Electronic surveys were disseminated nationwide to college students in health education and closely related programs. Of 477 student respondents, the most frequently indicated advocacy/public policy activity engaged in was voting (56%). The greatest benefit to advocacy was indicated as creating public awareness, while the most prevalent barrier reported was lack of familiarity with the legislation process. Less than one third of students reported receiving any training; however, training and the number of training sources were associated with greater involvement (p < .05). Comparisons by academic classification indicated that graduate students participated in more advocacy activities and reported significantly more benefits, barriers, knowledge, and self-efficacy compared with undergraduates. Regression analysis indicated that knowledge, self-efficacy, perceived benefits, and total number of training sources were significant predictors of advocacy involvement in both graduate and undergraduate student models, with age also contributing significantly to the graduate student model. Findings emphasize the need for increased training at earlier education levels to increase knowledge, self-efficacy, and advocacy/public policy involvement.
如果我们要让未来的健康促进工作队伍做好履行其职业责任的准备,了解他们的宣传和公共政策培训需求至关重要。本研究的目的是调查健康促进专业学生的宣传/公共政策参与情况、培训情况及看法。我们在全国范围内向健康教育及密切相关专业的大学生发放了电子调查问卷。在477名学生受访者中,最常参与的宣传/公共政策活动是投票(56%)。宣传带来的最大益处被认为是提高公众意识,而报告的最普遍障碍是对立法程序不熟悉。不到三分之一的学生报告接受过任何培训;然而,培训及培训来源的数量与更高的参与度相关(p < 0.05)。按学术分类进行的比较表明,与本科生相比,研究生参与了更多的宣传活动,并且报告的益处、障碍、知识及自我效能感显著更多。回归分析表明,知识、自我效能感、感知到的益处及培训来源总数在研究生和本科生模型中都是宣传参与度的显著预测因素,年龄对研究生模型也有显著贡献。研究结果强调,需要在早期教育阶段增加培训,以提高知识、自我效能感以及宣传/公共政策参与度。