Suppr超能文献

经皮肾镜取石术与腹腔镜手术治疗大型近端输尿管结石:两种不同治疗方式的经验

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Laparoscopy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: The Experience of Two Different Settings.

作者信息

Mousavi Bahar Seyed Habibollah, Amirhassani Shahriar, Nouralizadeh Akbar, ZerafatJou Nikan, Rasiuli Jaber

机构信息

Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran; email:

出版信息

Urol J. 2019 Oct 21;16(5):448-452. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4538.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to compare the success rate and complications of percutaneous nephrolithoto-my (PCNL) and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for the treatment of large proximal ureteral stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, the success rate and complications in 52 patients under-going PCNL in Hamadan's Shahid Beheshti Hospital and 55 patients undergoing laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in Tehran's Shahid Labbafinejad Hospital were compared. All patients had large proximal ureteral stones.

RESULTS

In the PCNL group, the mean age was 47.78 ±16.72 years, 75% were male, and 50% of calculi were on the upper right side and the rest on upper left side. The mean duration of surgery was 32 ± 9.4 minutes and success rate 100%. The mean stone size was 18.33 ± 2.63 mm in PCNL group and 21.29 ± 2.18 mm in laparoscopy group which was significantly different (P <.001). In the laparoscopy group, the mean age of patients was 42.92 ± 16.10 years and 83.6% were male. In this group, 46.6% of calculi were on the right side and the rest were on the left side. The mean duration of surgery was 107.43 ± 22.86 minutes and success rate was 100%. There was not a statistically significant association between surgical technique and age, gender, stone location, mean hospital stay length after surgery, degree of hydronephrosis and success rate (P >.05). However, surgery duration was significantly shorter in the PCNL group compared to the laparoscopy group (P <.001) and the decrease in hemoglobin, hematocrit and serum urea level was more pronounced in the PCNL group than in the laparoscopy group.

CONCLUSION

PCNL and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy met with the same success rate in the treatment of upper large ureteral stones. However, the two methods should be utilized depending on the hospital facilities and equip-ment, surgical team qualifications, and patient conditions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)和腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗近端输尿管大结石的成功率及并发症情况。

材料与方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,比较了哈马丹市沙希德·贝赫什提医院52例行PCNL的患者与德黑兰市沙希德·拉巴菲内贾德医院55例行腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术的患者的成功率及并发症情况。所有患者均患有近端输尿管大结石。

结果

PCNL组患者的平均年龄为47.78±16.72岁,75%为男性,50%的结石位于右侧上段,其余位于左侧上段。平均手术时长为32±9.4分钟,成功率为100%。PCNL组结石平均大小为18.33±2.63毫米,腹腔镜组为21.29±2.18毫米,差异有统计学意义(P<.001)。腹腔镜组患者的平均年龄为42.92±16.10岁,83.6%为男性。该组中,46.6%的结石位于右侧,其余位于左侧。平均手术时长为107.43±22.86分钟,成功率为100%。手术技术与年龄、性别、结石位置、术后平均住院时长、肾积水程度及成功率之间无统计学显著关联(P>.05)。然而,PCNL组的手术时长明显短于腹腔镜组(P<.001),且PCNL组血红蛋白、血细胞比容和血清尿素水平的下降比腹腔镜组更显著。

结论

PCNL和腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗上段输尿管大结石的成功率相同。然而,应根据医院设施和设备、手术团队资质及患者情况来选择使用这两种方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验