Suppr超能文献

[用于研究伤寒患者伤寒沙门菌和副伤寒沙门菌感染的格鲁伯 - 维达氏反应与酶联免疫吸附测定技术的比较]

[Comparison of the Gruber-Widal and ELISA technics used to study Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi infections in patients].

作者信息

Ayyildiz A, Demir Y, Tuncel E, Babacan M, Leloğlu S

出版信息

Mikrobiyol Bul. 1986 Jan;20(1):14-24.

PMID:3088401
Abstract

In this study, antibody levels were determined against the agents of typhoid and paratyphoid fever in 168 patient's sera and 40 healthy control sera by Gruber-Widal and ELISA techniques. We compared the results of these two techniques, and discussed. The needed antigens for both techniques were prepared from the local strains of the agents of these infections which were isolated in our laboratory. The widal's tube agglutination test was carried out by classical method, and the ELISA technique was done by the method of Woller et al. As a result, we found that the titers obtained by ELISA were as 4-6 times higher as than those of Widal's. Additionally nonspecific reactions were less seen in ELISA than in Widal.

摘要

在本研究中,采用肥达氏反应和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术,对168份患者血清和40份健康对照血清进行了抗伤寒和副伤寒病原体抗体水平的检测。我们比较了这两种技术的结果并进行了讨论。两种技术所需的抗原均由我们实验室分离的这些感染病原体的本地菌株制备。肥达氏试管凝集试验采用经典方法进行,ELISA技术则按照沃勒等人的方法进行。结果发现,ELISA法获得的效价比肥达氏反应法高4至6倍。此外,ELISA中出现的非特异性反应比肥达氏反应中少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验