Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
US Department of Agriculture - ARS, Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Environ Res. 2019 Jun;173:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.028. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
The use of surface and recycled water sources for irrigation can reduce demand on critical groundwater resources. Treatment or mitigation may be necessary for the use of these alternative water sources in order to reduce risk associated with microbial pathogens present in the water. In this study, the efficacy of a zero-valent iron (ZVI) sand filter was assessed for the reduction of Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli in surface water. Water recovered from an agricultural pond was inoculated with E. coli TVS353 and an environmental L. monocytogenes isolate at 7 Log CFU/mL and horizontally filtered over a six-month period through a PVC pipe filter, filled with 35%:65% (volume:volume) ZVI:sand or sand alone. Filtered water was used to irrigate lettuce and bacterial persistence on lettuce leaves was determined for 7 days post-irrigation. Both ZVI:sand-filtered water and sand-filtered water contained significantly (p < 0.005) lower levels of E. coli and L. monocytogenes compared to initial unfiltered inoculated water. Population reductions of E. coli and L. monocytogenes were comparable after sand filtration. However, ZVI:sand filtration resulted in significantly greater population reductions of L. monocytogenes (P < 0.05) compared to E. coli. Populations of E. coli on leaves of lettuce plants irrigated with ZVI:sand-filtered water were not significantly lower than populations on plants irrigated with sand-filtered irrigation water over the 7-day period. However, populations of L. monocytogenes on lettuce leaves irrigated with ZVI-treated water were significantly lower than counts on plants irrigated with sand-filtered irrigation water on days 3 and 4 post irrigation (p = 0.052 and p = 0.042 for days 3 and 4, respectively. The differences observed in reductions of L. monocytogenes and E. coli by ZVI filtration is due to the differing effect that ZVI disruption has on Gram-positive and Gram-negative cell walls and membranes. ZVI- sand filters show promising results as an inexpensive on-farm technology for the mitigation of enteric foodborne bacterial populations in pond water over a six-month period.
利用地表和再生水资源进行灌溉可以减少对关键地下水资源的需求。为了降低水中存在的微生物病原体带来的风险,可能需要对这些替代水源进行处理或缓解。在这项研究中,评估了零价铁(ZVI)砂滤器对地表水中李斯特菌和大肠杆菌的减少效果。从一个农业池塘中回收的水用大肠杆菌 TVS353 和环境李斯特菌分离物接种,接种浓度为 7 Log CFU/mL,并在六个月的时间内通过一个 PVC 管过滤器水平过滤,该过滤器填充有 35%:65%(体积:体积)的 ZVI:砂或仅砂。过滤后的水用于灌溉生菜,在灌溉后 7 天内测定生菜叶片上细菌的持久性。与初始未过滤接种水相比,ZVI:砂滤水和砂滤水都显著(p < 0.005)含有更低水平的大肠杆菌和李斯特菌。砂过滤后,大肠杆菌和李斯特菌的种群减少量相当。然而,ZVI:砂滤处理导致李斯特菌的种群减少量显著高于大肠杆菌(P < 0.05)。用 ZVI:砂滤水灌溉的生菜叶片上的大肠杆菌种群在 7 天的时间内没有显著低于用砂滤灌溉水灌溉的植物上的种群。然而,用 ZVI 处理水灌溉的生菜叶片上的李斯特菌种群在灌溉后第 3 和第 4 天显著低于用砂滤灌溉水灌溉的植物上的种群(第 3 和第 4 天的 p 值分别为 0.052 和 0.042)。ZVI 过滤对李斯特菌和大肠杆菌的减少效果不同,这是由于 ZVI 对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细胞壁和膜的不同破坏作用。ZVI-砂滤器作为一种廉价的农场内技术,在六个月的时间内显示出有希望的结果,可以缓解池塘水中的肠道食源性细菌种群。