Akbari Mohammad Reza, Sadeghi Arash Mirmohammad, Ghadimi Hadi, Nikdel Mojgan
Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J AAPOS. 2019 Apr;23(2):77.e1-77.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.11.009. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
To compare the outcome of inferior oblique disinsertion and myectomy in patients with unilateral congenital superior oblique palsy.
In this prospective study, consecutive patients with superior oblique palsy underwent either myectomy or disinsertion of the inferior oblique muscle. Success was defined as postoperative hypertropia of ≤5 in primary position and no hypotropia. In cases with preoperative hypertropia of ≤5, success was defined as improved hypertropia and resolution of abnormal head position (AHP).
A total of 62 patients were included: 34 underwent myectomy; 28, disinsertion. Preoperative primary position hypertropia was 15.8 ± 7.4 in the myectomy group and 14.5 ± 7.3 in the disinsertion (P = 0.756). AHP was present in 85.3% and 85.7% of patients, respectively (P = 1). Mean follow-up was in the myectomy group 7.5 ± 6.7 months and 6.9 ± 3.0 months in the disinsertion group (P = 0.637). Correction of hypertropia in primary position was more pronounced in the myectomy group (14.3 ± 7.4 vs 10.0 ± 5.4; P = 0.013). Success was achieved in 91.2% of myectomy and 60.7% of disinsertion patients (P = 0.006). Persistence of AHP did not differ between groups (8.8% in the myectomy group vs 7.1% in the disinsertion group [P = 1]). Comparison of patients with preoperative hypertropia of ≤15 revealed nonsignificant differences between groups in rate of success (100% vs 81.3% [P = 0.226]) and correction of primary position hypertropia (8.8 ± 3.2 vs 7.6 ± 4.0 [P = 0.336]).
In our study cohort, inferior oblique myectomy had a greater effect in reduction of primary position hypertropia; however, disinsertion proved as effective as myectomy if preoperative vertical deviation was ≤15. Both procedures effectively corrected AHP and demonstrated self-adjustment.
比较单侧先天性上斜肌麻痹患者下斜肌断腱术与下斜肌切除术的治疗效果。
在这项前瞻性研究中,连续性上斜肌麻痹患者接受了下斜肌切除术或下斜肌断腱术。成功的定义为:原在位时术后上斜视≤5三棱镜度且无下斜视。术前上斜视≤5三棱镜度的病例,成功的定义为上斜视改善且异常头位(AHP)消失。
共纳入62例患者:34例行下斜肌切除术;28例行下斜肌断腱术。下斜肌切除术组术前原在位上斜视度数为15.8±7.4三棱镜度,下斜肌断腱术组为14.5±7.3三棱镜度(P = 0.756)。分别有85.3%和85.7%的患者存在AHP(P = 1)。下斜肌切除术组平均随访7.5±6.7个月,下斜肌断腱术组平均随访6.9±3.0个月(P = 0.637)。下斜肌切除术组原在位上斜视的矫正更为显著(14.3±7.4三棱镜度 vs 10.0±5.4三棱镜度;P = 0.013)。下斜肌切除术组91.2%的患者和下斜肌断腱术组60.7%的患者治疗成功(P = 0.006)。两组间AHP持续存在的情况无差异(下斜肌切除术组为8.8%,下斜肌断腱术组为7.1%[P = 1])。对术前上斜视≤15三棱镜度的患者进行比较,两组在成功率(100% vs 81.3%[P = 0.226])和原在位上斜视矫正方面(8.8±3.2三棱镜度 vs 7.6±4.0三棱镜度[P = 0.336])无显著差异。
在我们的研究队列中,下斜肌切除术在减少原在位上斜视方面效果更佳;然而,如果术前垂直斜视≤15三棱镜度,断腱术与切除术效果相当。两种手术均能有效矫正AHP并显示出自我调整作用。