Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Apr;104(Suppl 1):S13-S21. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315430.
Improved measurement in early child development (ECD) is a strategic focus of the WHO, UNICEF and World Bank Nurturing Care Framework. However, evidence-based approaches to monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of ECD projects in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) are lacking. The Grand Challenges Canada®-funded Saving Brains® ECD portfolio provides a unique opportunity to explore approaches to M&E of ECD programmes across diverse settings. Focused literature review and participatory mixed-method evaluation of the Saving Brains portfolio was undertaken using an adapted impact framework. Findings related to measurement of quality, coverage and outcomes for scaling ECD were considered. Thirty-nine ECD projects implemented in 23 LMIC were evaluated. Projects used a 'theory of change' based M&E approach to measure a range of inputs, outputs and outcomes. Over 29 projects measured cognitive, language, motor and socioemotional outcomes. 18 projects used developmental screening tools to measure outcomes, with a trade-off between feasibility and preferred practice. Environmental inputs such as the home environment were measured in 15 projects. Qualitative data reflected the importance of measurement of project quality and coverage, despite challenges measuring these constructs across contexts. Improved measurement of intervention quality and measurement of coverage, which requires definition of the numerator (ie, intervention) and denominator (ie, population in need/at risk), are needed for scaling ECD programmes. Innovation in outcome measurement, including intermediary outcome measures that are feasible and practical to measure in routine services, is also required, with disaggregation to better target interventions to those most in need and ensure that no child is left behind.
改善儿童早期发展(ECD)的衡量标准是世卫组织、儿基会和世界银行养育关怀框架的战略重点。然而,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)中,缺乏针对儿童早期发展项目监测和评价(M&E)的循证方法。加拿大大挑战基金会资助的“拯救大脑”ECD 项目组合提供了一个独特的机会,可以探索在不同环境下对 ECD 项目进行 M&E 的方法。使用适应性影响框架,对“拯救大脑”项目组合进行了重点文献回顾和参与式混合方法评价。考虑了与衡量 ECD 扩大规模的质量、覆盖范围和结果有关的发现。对在 23 个 LMIC 实施的 39 个 ECD 项目进行了评价。项目采用基于“变革理论”的 M&E 方法来衡量一系列投入、产出和结果。超过 29 个项目测量了认知、语言、运动和社会情感结果。18 个项目使用发展性筛选工具来衡量结果,在可行性和首选实践之间存在权衡。15 个项目测量了环境投入,如家庭环境。定性数据反映了衡量项目质量和覆盖范围的重要性,尽管在不同背景下衡量这些结构存在挑战。需要改进干预质量的衡量以及覆盖范围的衡量,这需要定义分子(即干预)和分母(即需要/处于风险中的人群),以便扩大 ECD 方案的规模。还需要创新结果衡量方法,包括可行且实际的中间结果衡量方法,以便在常规服务中进行衡量,并进行细分,以便更有针对性地将干预措施针对最需要的人群,并确保不遗漏任何儿童。