Reply to Hamaker and Ryan: Within-sample temporal instability in cross-sectional estimates.
作者信息
Fisher Aaron J, Jeronimus Bertus F, Medaglia John D
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
Department of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, Groningen University, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6546-6547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820222116. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Hamaker and Ryan: Within-sample temporal instability in cross-sectional estimates.对哈梅克和瑞安的回应：横断面估计中的样本内时间不稳定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6546-6547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820222116. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
2
Who's Willing? Characteristics Associated with Willingness to Participate in Clinical Research.谁愿意？与参与临床研究意愿相关的特征。
IRB. 2016 Mar-Apr;38(2):15-9.
3
A cross-sectional survey to investigate community understanding of medical research ethics committees.一项旨在调查社区对医学研究伦理委员会理解程度的横断面调查。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Jul;41(7):545-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101613. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
4
What research participants want to know about genetic research results: the impact of "genetic exceptionalism".研究参与者想了解的关于基因研究结果的内容：“基因例外论”的影响。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep;6(3):39-46. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.39.
5
Reply to Adolf and Fried: Conditional equivalence and imperatives for person-level science.对阿道夫和弗里德的回应：个人层面科学的条件等价性与必要性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6542-6543. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820221116. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
6
Optimal survey design for community intervention evaluations: cohort or cross-sectional?社区干预评估的最佳调查设计：队列研究还是横断面研究？
J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;48(12):1461-72. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00055-0.
7
Decision-making capacity for research participation among addicted people: a cross-sectional study.成瘾者参与研究的决策能力：一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jan 13;17:3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0086-9.
8
Limited notions of culture ensure research failure.
Am Indian Alsk Nativ Ment Health Res (1987). 1989;2(3):25-8. doi: 10.5820/aian.0203.1989.25.
9
A method to quantitatively evaluate the Hamaker constant using the jump-into-contact effect in atomic force microscopy.一种利用原子力显微镜中的接触跃变效应定量评估哈梅克常数的方法。
Nanotechnology. 2007 Jan 24;18(3):035501. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/18/3/035501. Epub 2007 Jan 3.
10
Transcultural research run amok or Arctic hysteria?
Am Indian Alsk Nativ Ment Health Res (1987). 1989;2(3):46-50. doi: 10.5820/aian.0203.1989.46.
本文引用的文献
1
A squared standard error is not a measure of individual differences.标准误差的平方不是个体差异的度量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6544-6545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818033116. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
2
Ergodicity is sufficient but not necessary for group-to-individual generalizability.遍历性对于从群体到个体的可推广性来说是充分的，但不是必要的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6540-6541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818675116. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
3
Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research.群体到个体的泛化不足是对人类受试者研究的一种威胁。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 3;115(27):E6106-E6115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711978115. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
Zotero 插件