Suppr超能文献

推荐在 TNM8 指南下的口咽癌患者中确定 HPV 状态的方法:两阶段方法。

Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach.

机构信息

Centre for Cell Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2019 Apr;120(8):827-833. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0414-9. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

TNM8 staging for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) surrogates p16 immunohistochemistry for HPV testing. Patients with p16+ OPSCC may lack HPV aetiology. Here, we evaluate the suitability of TNM8 staging for guiding prognosis in such patients.

METHODS

HPV status was ascertained using p16 immunohistochemistry and high-risk HPV RNA and DNA in situ hybridisation. Survival by stage in a cohort of OPSCC patients was evaluated using TNM7/TNM8 staging. Survival of p16+/HPV- patients was compared to p16 status.

RESULTS

TNM8 staging was found to improve on TNM7 (log rank p = 0·0190 for TNM8 compared with p = 0·0530 for TNM7) in p16+ patients. Patients who tested p16+ but were HPV- (n = 20) had significantly reduced five-year survival (33%) compared to p16+ patients (77%) but not p16- patients (35%). Cancer stage was reduced in 95% of p16+/HPV- patients despite having a mortality rate twice (HR 2.66 [95% CI: 1.37-5.15]) that of p16+/HPV+ patients under new TNM8 staging criteria.

CONCLUSION

Given the significantly poorer survival of p16+/HPV- OPSCCs, these data provide compelling evidence for use of an HPV-specific test for staging classification. This has particular relevance in light of potential treatment de-escalation that could expose these patients to inappropriately reduced treatment intensity as treatment algorithms evolve.

摘要

背景

口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)的 TNM8 分期以 p16 免疫组化代替 HPV 检测作为替代指标。p16+ OPSCC 患者可能缺乏 HPV 病因。在此,我们评估 TNM8 分期用于指导此类患者预后的适宜性。

方法

使用 p16 免疫组化和高危型 HPV RNA 和 DNA 原位杂交检测 HPV 状态。使用 TNM7/TNM8 分期评估 OPSCC 患者队列的分期生存情况。将 p16+/HPV- 患者的生存情况与 p16 状态进行比较。

结果

与 TNM7 相比(p16+ 患者中 TNM8 为 log rank p=0.0190,而 TNM7 为 p=0.0530),TNM8 分期发现改善了 TNM7(p=0.0190)。20 例 p16+但 HPV- 的患者(n=20)的五年生存率明显降低(33%),而 p16+患者(77%)和 p16-患者(35%)没有差异。尽管根据新的 TNM8 分期标准,p16+/HPV-患者的死亡率是 p16+/HPV+患者的两倍(HR 2.66 [95%CI:1.37-5.15]),但仍有 95%的患者癌症分期降低。

结论

鉴于 p16+/HPV- OPSCC 的生存明显较差,这些数据为使用 HPV 特异性检测进行分期分类提供了有力的证据。鉴于随着治疗方案的发展,这些患者可能会因治疗强度降低而受到不适当的治疗,因此这一点尤其重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/988c/6474272/eced32d73632/41416_2019_414_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验