Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123, Dapi Road, Niaosung District, Kaohsiung, 83301, Taiwan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Aug;31(1):24-29. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00704-9.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Perampanel is a novel anti-epileptic drug (AED) which acts as a non-competitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antagonist to reduce glutamate-mediated postsynaptic excitation. Previous animal studies and a few case reports/series have suggested that it may be effective to treat refractory status epilepticus (RSE).
We retrospectively reviewed 67 consecutive patients with RSE, of whom 22 received perampanel. The clinical features, epidemiology-based mortality score in status epilepticus, status epilepticus severity score, seizure control, functional outcome, RSE etiology, and electroencephalogram findings were collected. Responder to perampanel was defined as seizure resolution within 4 days of therapy with perampanel being the last AED used plus no recurrence during hospitalization.
Eight of the 22 (36.4%) RSE patients fulfilled the definition of responder to perampanel. An additional 1 patient responded to perampanel after 4 days of treatment. In total, perampanel was the last AED in 9 (40.1%) patients. Among the 8 responders to perampanel, 5 had convulsive SE, 1 had non-convulsive SE, and 2 had focal motor SE. The responders accounted for both of the patients with focal motor SE (100%), 5 (33.3%) of the 15 patients with convulsive SE, and 1 (20%) of the 5 patients with non-convulsive SE. The ictal and inter-ictal activities also decreased after perampanel therapy, and three patients (13.6%) had preferable outcomes at last follow-up.
Perampanel may be an effective add-on treatment for RSE even in patients who failed multiple AEDs. Our study suggests that perampanel may be more effective for focal motor SE and convulsive SE than non-convulsive SE. As most previous studies have focused on non-convulsive SE, further studies are warranted to clarify the effectiveness of perampanel for different subtypes of SE.
背景/目的:吡仑帕奈是一种新型抗癫痫药物(AED),作为一种非竞争性 α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸受体拮抗剂,可减少谷氨酸介导的突触后兴奋。先前的动物研究和一些病例报告/系列表明,它可能对治疗难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE)有效。
我们回顾性分析了 67 例连续的 RSE 患者,其中 22 例接受了吡仑帕奈治疗。收集了临床特征、癫痫持续状态基于流行病学的死亡率评分、癫痫持续状态严重程度评分、癫痫发作控制、功能结局、RSE 病因和脑电图发现。吡仑帕奈的应答者定义为在开始使用吡仑帕奈治疗后 4 天内癫痫发作得到缓解,并且在住院期间无复发,吡仑帕奈是最后一种使用的 AED。
22 例 RSE 患者中有 8 例(36.4%)符合吡仑帕奈应答者的定义。另有 1 例患者在治疗 4 天后对吡仑帕奈有反应。总共,吡仑帕奈是 9 例(40.1%)患者的最后一种 AED。在 8 例对吡仑帕奈有反应的患者中,5 例有惊厥性癫痫持续状态,1 例有无惊厥性癫痫持续状态,2 例有局灶性运动性癫痫持续状态。应答者包括 2 例局灶性运动性癫痫持续状态患者(100%)、15 例惊厥性癫痫持续状态患者中的 5 例(33.3%)和 5 例非惊厥性癫痫持续状态患者中的 1 例(20%)。吡仑帕奈治疗后癫痫发作和发作间期活动也减少,3 例(13.6%)患者在最后一次随访时预后较好。
即使在使用多种 AED 治疗失败的患者中,吡仑帕奈也可能是一种有效的附加治疗 RSE 的药物。我们的研究表明,吡仑帕奈对局灶性运动性癫痫持续状态和惊厥性癫痫持续状态可能比非惊厥性癫痫持续状态更有效。由于大多数先前的研究都集中在非惊厥性癫痫持续状态上,因此需要进一步的研究来阐明吡仑帕奈对不同类型癫痫持续状态的有效性。