• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用坐标测量机测量选择性激光熔化增材制造技术制作的全弓钴铬种植体框架的种植体修复学差异。

Implant Prosthodontic Discrepancy of Complete-Arch Co-Cr Implant Frameworks Manufactured Through Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Technology Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 May/June;34(3):698–707. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6739. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.6739
PMID:30892285
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective was to measure the implant prosthodontic discrepancy of complete-arch implant-supported frameworks made of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) fabricated using selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing technologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A completely edentulous maxillary cast with seven implant replicas was obtained. Co-Cr SLM frameworks (n = 9) from three different providers (SLM-1, SLM-2, SLM-3) were manufactured. A coordinate measuring machine was selected to measure the implant prosthodontic discrepancy (μm) on the x-, y-, and z-axis and the 3D gap (3D = √x+ y+z) where implants were considered as the statistical unit (n = 7). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Student-Newman-Keuls, and Tukey tests were used to analyze the data (α = .05).

RESULTS

The mean 3D implant prosthodontic discrepancy (μm) was higher for SLM-1 (73.77 ± 27.94) than for SLM-2 (47.54 ± 22.63) and SLM-3 (47.26 ± 22.57). At the x-axis, SLM-2 showed a significantly smaller gap (16.21 ± 9.6) than SLM-3 (32.92 ± 27.77) and SLM-1 (34.77 ± 21.85). At the y-axis, however, SLM-3 presented a significantly smaller gap (27.97 ± 9.49) than SLM-2 (38.84 ± 27.82) and SLM-1 (54.35 ± 29.89). Similarly, at the z-axis, SLM-3 (4.01 ± 2.29) showed the least gap, followed by SLM-2 (9.09 ± 7.63), being significantly smaller than that of SLM-1 (16.14 ± 21.09).

CONCLUSION

The three SLM additive manufacturing technologies tested showed implant prosthodontic discrepancies ranging from 4.01 to 54.35 μm, which could be considered in the clinically acceptable range. Distortion at the z-axis was significantly less compared to x- and y-axes in all the groups tested.

摘要

目的

测量使用选择性激光熔化(SLM)增材制造技术制造的钴铬(Co-Cr)全口种植体支持框架的种植体修复学差异。

材料和方法

获得了带有七个种植体复制件的完全无牙上颌模型。制造了来自三个不同供应商的 Co-Cr SLM 框架(n = 9):SLM-1、SLM-2 和 SLM-3。选择坐标测量机来测量 x、y 和 z 轴上的种植体修复学差异(μm)和 3D 间隙(3D = √x+ y+z),其中以种植体为统计单位(n = 7)。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)、Student-Newman-Keuls 和 Tukey 检验来分析数据(α =.05)。

结果

在 x、y 和 z 轴上,SLM-2 在 x 轴上的间隙(16.21 ± 9.6)明显小于 SLM-3(32.92 ± 27.77)和 SLM-1(34.77 ± 21.85),而在 y 轴上,SLM-3 的间隙(27.97 ± 9.49)明显小于 SLM-2(38.84 ± 27.82)和 SLM-1(54.35 ± 29.89)。同样,在 z 轴上,SLM-3(4.01 ± 2.29)的间隙最小,其次是 SLM-2(9.09 ± 7.63),明显小于 SLM-1(16.14 ± 21.09)。

结论

测试的三种 SLM 增材制造技术显示种植体修复学差异在 4.01 至 54.35 μm 之间,可被认为在临床可接受范围内。与所有测试组的 x 和 y 轴相比,z 轴的变形明显更小。

相似文献

1
Implant Prosthodontic Discrepancy of Complete-Arch Co-Cr Implant Frameworks Manufactured Through Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Technology Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.使用坐标测量机测量选择性激光熔化增材制造技术制作的全弓钴铬种植体框架的种植体修复学差异。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 May/June;34(3):698–707. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6739. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
2
Discrepancy of complete-arch titanium frameworks manufactured using selective laser melting and electron beam melting additive manufacturing technologies.采用选择性激光熔化和电子束熔化增材制造技术制作全口钛架的差异。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Dec;120(6):942-947. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
3
[Pure titanium denture large-span frameworks additively manufactured with selective laser melting].[采用选择性激光熔化增材制造的纯钛义齿大跨度框架]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 9;56(7):646-651. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20210405-00162.
4
Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.制造技术对钴铬合金种植体支持的多单位修复体边缘和内部适合性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Nov;120(5):715-720. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
5
Discrepancy at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface of complete-arch cobalt-chromium implant frameworks fabricated by additive and subtractive technologies before and after ceramic veneering.全瓷覆盖前后,采用增材和减材技术制作的全弓钴铬种植体框架在种植体基台-修复体界面处的差异。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May;125(5):795-803. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 May 24.
6
Internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium posts fabricated by selective laser melting technology.选择性激光熔化技术制备的钴铬合金桩的内部适应性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Mar;121(3):455-460. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
7
Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.采用选择性激光熔化技术制作的金属陶瓷冠的临床边缘适合性和内部适合性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jun;113(6):623-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.10.012. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
8
Implant-Abutment Discrepancy Before and After Acrylic Resin Veneering of Complete-Arch Titanium Frameworks Manufactured Using Milling and Electron Beam Melting Technologies.全桥架钛合金基底经铣削和电子束熔融技术制造后行丙烯酸树脂修复体覆盖前、后的基台-修复体误差。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Mar;31(S1):88-96. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13422.
9
Additively Manufactured Titanium and Cobalt-Chromium Implant Frameworks: Fit and Effect of Ceramic Veneering.增材制造的钛和钴铬合金种植体框架:陶瓷贴面的贴合度及效果
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):590-596. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6028.
10
A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.采用新型制造技术和合金体系制作的钴铬合金冠边缘适合性的显微计算机断层扫描评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Mar;117(3):393-399. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Interface misfit of conventionally milled and novel hybrid full-arch implant-supported titanium frameworks.常规铣削和新型混合全口种植体支持钛框架的界面不匹配。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):1205. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04973-5.
2
The Applications of 3D-Printing Technology in Prosthodontics: A Review of the Current Literature.3D打印技术在口腔修复学中的应用:当前文献综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68501. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68501. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Accuracy of fit for cobaltchromium bar over two implants fabricated with different manufacturing techniques: an in-vitro study.
钴铬棒在两种不同制造技术下的两种种植体中的拟合精度:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03700-w.
4
Additive manufacturing technologies in the oral implant clinic: A review of current applications and progress.口腔种植临床中的增材制造技术:当前应用与进展综述
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jan 20;11:1100155. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1100155. eCollection 2023.
5
The effect of framework fabrication technique on the fit accuracy of full arch screw retained implant supported prostheses.支架制作技术对全牙弓螺丝固位种植体支持式修复体适合精度的影响。
Saudi Dent J. 2022 May;34(4):288-297. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
6
The effect of the digital manufacturing technique of cantilevered implant-supported frameworks on abutment screw preload.悬臂式种植体支持框架的数字化制造技术对基台螺钉预紧力的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;14(1):22-31. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.1.22. Epub 2022 Feb 25.