Suppr超能文献

使用坐标测量机测量选择性激光熔化增材制造技术制作的全弓钴铬种植体框架的种植体修复学差异。

Implant Prosthodontic Discrepancy of Complete-Arch Co-Cr Implant Frameworks Manufactured Through Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Technology Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 May/June;34(3):698–707. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6739. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective was to measure the implant prosthodontic discrepancy of complete-arch implant-supported frameworks made of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) fabricated using selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing technologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A completely edentulous maxillary cast with seven implant replicas was obtained. Co-Cr SLM frameworks (n = 9) from three different providers (SLM-1, SLM-2, SLM-3) were manufactured. A coordinate measuring machine was selected to measure the implant prosthodontic discrepancy (μm) on the x-, y-, and z-axis and the 3D gap (3D = √x+ y+z) where implants were considered as the statistical unit (n = 7). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Student-Newman-Keuls, and Tukey tests were used to analyze the data (α = .05).

RESULTS

The mean 3D implant prosthodontic discrepancy (μm) was higher for SLM-1 (73.77 ± 27.94) than for SLM-2 (47.54 ± 22.63) and SLM-3 (47.26 ± 22.57). At the x-axis, SLM-2 showed a significantly smaller gap (16.21 ± 9.6) than SLM-3 (32.92 ± 27.77) and SLM-1 (34.77 ± 21.85). At the y-axis, however, SLM-3 presented a significantly smaller gap (27.97 ± 9.49) than SLM-2 (38.84 ± 27.82) and SLM-1 (54.35 ± 29.89). Similarly, at the z-axis, SLM-3 (4.01 ± 2.29) showed the least gap, followed by SLM-2 (9.09 ± 7.63), being significantly smaller than that of SLM-1 (16.14 ± 21.09).

CONCLUSION

The three SLM additive manufacturing technologies tested showed implant prosthodontic discrepancies ranging from 4.01 to 54.35 μm, which could be considered in the clinically acceptable range. Distortion at the z-axis was significantly less compared to x- and y-axes in all the groups tested.

摘要

目的

测量使用选择性激光熔化(SLM)增材制造技术制造的钴铬(Co-Cr)全口种植体支持框架的种植体修复学差异。

材料和方法

获得了带有七个种植体复制件的完全无牙上颌模型。制造了来自三个不同供应商的 Co-Cr SLM 框架(n = 9):SLM-1、SLM-2 和 SLM-3。选择坐标测量机来测量 x、y 和 z 轴上的种植体修复学差异(μm)和 3D 间隙(3D = √x+ y+z),其中以种植体为统计单位(n = 7)。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)、Student-Newman-Keuls 和 Tukey 检验来分析数据(α =.05)。

结果

在 x、y 和 z 轴上,SLM-2 在 x 轴上的间隙(16.21 ± 9.6)明显小于 SLM-3(32.92 ± 27.77)和 SLM-1(34.77 ± 21.85),而在 y 轴上,SLM-3 的间隙(27.97 ± 9.49)明显小于 SLM-2(38.84 ± 27.82)和 SLM-1(54.35 ± 29.89)。同样,在 z 轴上,SLM-3(4.01 ± 2.29)的间隙最小,其次是 SLM-2(9.09 ± 7.63),明显小于 SLM-1(16.14 ± 21.09)。

结论

测试的三种 SLM 增材制造技术显示种植体修复学差异在 4.01 至 54.35 μm 之间,可被认为在临床可接受范围内。与所有测试组的 x 和 y 轴相比,z 轴的变形明显更小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验