Diego Isabel Maria Alguacil, Fernández-Carnero Josue, Val Sofía Laguarta, Cano-de-la-Cuerda Roberto, Calvo-Lobo César, Piédrola Rosa Martínez, Oliva Laura Cristina Luna, Rueda Francisco Molina
Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation, and Physical Medicine. Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Feb;65(2):156-164. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.2.156.
BACKGROUND: To date, there is a lack of prior studies on the use of capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency (RF) to treat neck pain. The objective of this study was to investigate the immediate effect of capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency (RF=448 kHz), in comparison with a placebo, on (1) reducing neck pain intensity at myofascial trigger points (MTrP), (2) decreasing neck disability and (3) improving cervical range of motion (CROM). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02353195) was carried out. Patients with myofascial chronic neck pain (N=24) with active MTrP in one upper trapezius muscle were randomly divided into two groups: a radio-frequency group, which received eight sessions of a monopolar capacitive resistive radio-frequency application over the upper trapezius muscle, and a placebo group (PG), which received eight sessions of placebo radio-frequency over the same muscle. Visual analog scale (VAS), CROM and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were evaluated after the first session and after the eight sessions. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for VAS showed statistically significant differences between baseline, immediately after the first session and after eight sessions (p<.001). No significant differences for PG were found. No differences were observed between groups. NDI improved in both groups after eight sessions, but no differences were found between groups (p<.05). ANOVA for time factor showed statistically significant changes in the right cervical rotation in both groups (F=4.112; p=.026) after eight sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Even though there were no differences between both groups, the monopolar capacitive, resistive RF could have a potential effect on pain intensity.
背景:迄今为止,关于使用电容电阻单极射频(RF)治疗颈部疼痛的先前研究尚属空白。本研究的目的是调查电容电阻单极射频(RF = 448 kHz)与安慰剂相比,对(1)降低肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)处的颈部疼痛强度、(2)减少颈部功能障碍以及(3)改善颈椎活动范围(CROM)的即时效果。 方法:开展了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(NCT02353195)。一侧上斜方肌存在活跃性MTrP的肌筋膜性慢性颈部疼痛患者(N = 24)被随机分为两组:射频组,接受在上斜方肌上进行八次单极电容电阻射频治疗;安慰剂组(PG),在同一肌肉上接受八次安慰剂射频治疗。在第一次治疗后和八次治疗后评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)、CROM和颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)。 结果:VAS的Wilcoxon检验显示,基线、第一次治疗后即刻和八次治疗后之间存在统计学显著差异(p <.001)。PG组未发现显著差异。两组之间未观察到差异。八次治疗后两组的NDI均有所改善,但组间未发现差异(p <.05)。时间因素的方差分析显示,八次治疗后两组的右颈椎旋转均有统计学显著变化(F = 4.112;p =.026)。 结论:尽管两组之间没有差异,但单极电容电阻RF可能对疼痛强度有潜在影响。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2010
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025-8-12
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-11-26
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-8-19