Suppr超能文献

平衡训练对髋部骨折患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Efficacy of balance training for hip fracture patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Wu Jia-Qi, Mao Lin-Bo, Wu Jian

机构信息

Rehabilitation Department, Jingjiang People's Hospital, Jingjiang, Taizhou, Jiangsu Province, China.

Institute Office, Jingjiang People's Hospital, No. 28, Zhongzhou road, Jingjiang, Taizhou, 214500, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Mar 20;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1125-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether the clinical effects of balance training were improved in hip fracture patients.

METHODS

Electronic databases which included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2018 were searched. High-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective clinical controlled studies were selected based on inclusion criteria. Stata 12.0 was used for the meta-analysis. Standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the effects.

RESULTS

Finally, 9 studies with 872 patients (balance training = 445, control = 427) were included in our meta-analysis (published between 1997 and 2018). Compared with the control group, balance training group showed a significant increase in overall function (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI [0.25, 0.93], P = 0.001), gait speed (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI [0.19, 1.07], P = 0.005), lower limb strength (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI [0.50, 0.95], P = 0.000), activities of daily living (ADLs) (SMD = 0.97, 95% CI [0.61, 1.34], P = 0.000), performance task scores (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI [0.21, 0.61], P = 0.000), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.16, 0.47], P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis revealed that the balance training group has improved overall physical functioning, gait, lower limb strength, performance task, and activity of daily living than the control group. More high-quality and large-scale RCTs are needed to identify the optimal regimen of balance training after hip fracture.

摘要

背景

探讨髋部骨折患者平衡训练的临床效果是否得到改善。

方法

检索截至2018年12月的电子数据库,包括PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆。根据纳入标准选择高质量的随机对照试验(RCT)和前瞻性临床对照研究。使用Stata 12.0进行荟萃分析。采用95%置信区间(CI)的标准平均差(SMD)评估效果。

结果

最终,9项研究共872例患者(平衡训练组=445例,对照组=427例)纳入我们的荟萃分析(发表于1997年至2018年之间)。与对照组相比,平衡训练组在整体功能(SMD=0.59,95%CI[0.25,0.93],P=0.001)、步速(SMD=0.63,95%CI[0.19,1.07],P=0.005)、下肢力量(SMD=0.73,95%CI[0.50,0.95],P=0.000)、日常生活活动(ADL)(SMD=0.97,95%CI[0.61,1.34],P=0.000)、执行任务得分(SMD=0.41,95%CI[0.21,0.61],P=0.000)和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)得分(SMD=0.32,95%CI[0.16,0.47],P=0.000)方面均有显著提高。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,与对照组相比,平衡训练组在整体身体功能、步态、下肢力量、执行任务和日常生活活动方面均有改善。需要更多高质量、大规模的随机对照试验来确定髋部骨折后平衡训练的最佳方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cd0/6425661/9788b0827364/13018_2019_1125_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验