Suppr超能文献

使用不同修复材料对牙龈退缩型缺损进行联合手术/修复治疗的临床评估:一项随机临床试验。

Clinical evaluation of combined surgical/ restorative treatment of gingival recession-type defects using different restorative materials: A randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Isler Sila Cagri, Ozcan Gonen, Ozcan Mustafa, Omurlu Huma

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

J Dent Sci. 2018 Mar;13(1):20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: An ideal therapeutic procedure for the treatment of gingival recession associated with an NCCL has presented a challenge to clinicians. Various dental materials and surgical approaches have been used to manage gingival recessions associated with NCCLs for the most predictable combined surgical/restorative treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the treatment of gingival recessions associated with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) using a modified coronally advanced flap (MCAF) in combination with a connective tissue graft (CTG) on restored root surfaces.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three systemically healthy subjects, who were positive for the presence of three cervical lesions associated with gingival recessions in three different adjacent teeth, were enrolled in the study. The NCCL were each restored prior to surgery by using one of three different materials: nanofilled composite resin (NCR), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGI) or giomer. The gingival recession defects were treated by CTG.

RESULTS

Inter-group differences were not statistically significant for probing depth (PD), relative recession height (rRH), relative clinical attachment level (rCAL), keratinized tissue width (KTW) or keratinized tissue thickness (KTT) (p > 0.05) among the groups at any time. The mean percentage of defect coverage was 71.18 ± 23.16% for NCR + CTG group; 71.33 ± 22.33% for RMGI + CTG group; and 64.23 ± 20.33% for giomer + CTG group at 1 year postoperatively (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combined surgical/restorative treatments provided successful clinical results. Giomer + CTG may be less effective compared to other groups for treatment of gingival recession associated with NCCL.

摘要

背景/目的:治疗与非龋性颈部病变(NCCL)相关的牙龈退缩的理想治疗方法一直是临床医生面临的挑战。为了实现最可预测的联合手术/修复治疗,人们使用了各种牙科材料和手术方法来处理与NCCL相关的牙龈退缩。本研究的目的是评估在修复后的牙根表面使用改良冠向推进瓣(MCAF)联合结缔组织移植(CTG)治疗与非龋性颈部病变(NCCL)相关的牙龈退缩。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了23名全身健康的受试者,他们在三颗不同相邻牙齿上存在与牙龈退缩相关的三个颈部病变。在手术前,分别使用三种不同材料之一对NCCL进行修复:纳米填充复合树脂(NCR)、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGI)或聚酸改性复合树脂(giomer)。牙龈退缩缺损采用CTG治疗。

结果

在任何时间点,各组之间的探诊深度(PD)、相对退缩高度(rRH)、相对临床附着水平(rCAL)、角化组织宽度(KTW)或角化组织厚度(KTT)的组间差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。术后1年,NCR+CTG组的缺损覆盖平均百分比为71.18±23.16%;RMGI+CTG组为71.33±22.33%;giomer+CTG组为64.23±20.33%(p>0.05)。

结论

联合手术/修复治疗取得了成功的临床效果。与其他组相比,giomer+CTG治疗与NCCL相关的牙龈退缩可能效果较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c62/6388842/b527637f7069/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验