Erol Ozan, Buyuklu Fuat, Koycu Alper, Bas Ceren, Erbek Selim S
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, 06490, Bahcelievler, Ankara, Turkey.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Aug;43(4):1021-1027. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01352-2. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
A good understanding of nasal tip support mechanisms is essential for achieving successful and functional rhinoplasty results. The loss of nasal tip support resulting from different maneuvers adopted during rhinoplasty and how this loss is affected by reconstructive applications should be known. This study evaluated and compared changes in nasal tip support perioperatively after different techniques were used during septorhinoplasty.
Patients who underwent primary open rhinoplasty between January 2018 and March 2018 in a tertiary medical center were included in this prospective blind case series. Nasal tip resistance measurements were taken after perioperative maneuvers by creating enough force to achieve 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm of displacement at the tip region. Measurements were obtained during six different stages using a Newton meter: preoperatively, after caudal septal resection, after skin flap elevation, after the columellar strut or tongue-in-groove procedure, after tip suturing and postoperatively. Our hypothesis was that during septorhinoplasty, each maneuver used changes the tip support intraoperatively. The predictor variables were the different rhinoplasty techniques used. The outcome variable was nasal tip resistance to compression intraoperatively and immediate postoperatively. Appropriate statistics were computed, and a p < 0.05 value was considered significant.
Ten of the 15 patients were female, and 5 were male. The patient age ranged from 19 to 40 (mean 24.8 ± 4.9). The tongue-in-groove technique was applied in 5 of the patients, while columellar strut grafting was performed in 10. The application of columellar strut grafting did not create a significant increase in nasal tip support (p > 0.05). An increase in nasal tip support was observed at each stage (85%, 53%, 35%) after application of the tongue-in-groove technique (p < 0.05).
A novel and reproducible technique for digitally evaluating manual force is presented for determining changes in nasal tip support with different maneuvers applied in living patients undergoing rhinoplasty. No significant difference was noted between the preoperative and postoperative measurements for columellar strut grafting. The tongue-in-groove technique is an important maneuver that has a significant effect on nasal tip support. According to our data, the interdomal and intercrural ligaments, the medial crus-septum connections and the connections between alar cartilage and overlying skin and muscle tissue are important structures for tip support.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
充分了解鼻尖支撑机制对于实现成功且功能良好的鼻整形手术效果至关重要。应了解鼻整形手术中采用的不同操作导致的鼻尖支撑力丧失情况,以及这种丧失如何受到重建应用的影响。本研究评估并比较了鼻中隔鼻整形术中使用不同技术后围手术期鼻尖支撑的变化。
本前瞻性盲法病例系列纳入了2018年1月至2018年3月在一家三级医疗中心接受初次开放式鼻整形手术的患者。在围手术期操作后,通过施加足够的力使鼻尖区域产生1毫米、2毫米和3毫米的位移,进行鼻尖阻力测量。使用牛顿计在六个不同阶段进行测量:术前、鼻中隔尾侧切除后、皮瓣掀起后、鼻小柱支撑或榫槽手术之后、鼻尖缝合后及术后。我们的假设是,在鼻中隔鼻整形术中,所使用的每种操作都会在术中改变鼻尖支撑。预测变量是所使用的不同鼻整形技术。结果变量是术中及术后即刻鼻尖对压缩的阻力。计算了适当的统计数据,p < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
15例患者中10例为女性,5例为男性。患者年龄在19至40岁之间(平均24.8±4.9)。5例患者采用了榫槽技术,10例进行了鼻小柱支撑移植。鼻小柱支撑移植的应用并未使鼻尖支撑力显著增加(p > 0.05)。应用榫槽技术后,在每个阶段均观察到鼻尖支撑力增加(85%、53%、35%)(p < 0.05)。
提出了一种新颖且可重复的数字评估手动力量的技术,用于确定在接受鼻整形手术的活体患者中应用不同操作时鼻尖支撑的变化。鼻小柱支撑移植术前和术后测量结果无显著差异。榫槽技术是一种对鼻尖支撑有显著影响的重要操作。根据我们的数据,鼻内和鼻背韧带、内侧脚-鼻中隔连接以及鼻翼软骨与上方皮肤和肌肉组织之间的连接是鼻尖支撑的重要结构。
证据水平IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266 。