Suppr超能文献

预防性胰管支架置入术治疗重症急性坏死性胰腺炎:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting in severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective randomized study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2019 Nov;51(11):1027-1034. doi: 10.1055/a-0865-1960. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic duct disruption is common and is associated with high morbidity in cases of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). In this study, we tested the feasibility and safety of prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting (PPDS) in ANP and compared PPDS with conservative treatment.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients (aged 18 - 75 years) diagnosed with ANP between February 2011 and July 2015. These patients were prospectively randomized to receive PPDS or conservative treatment at two tertiary centers. PPDS was performed as soon as possible after randomization.

RESULTS

Concern regarding iatrogenic infections with pancreatic necrosis in the PPDS group prompted interim analysis, which confirmed a highly elevated risk. Thus, the trial was terminated prematurely for ethical reasons. Of the 11 patients in the PPDS group, all patients with successful pancreatic duct placement (5/5, 100 %) presented with infection, compared with only 3 of the 13 patients (23.1 %) in the conservative treatment group ( = 0.01). Analysis revealed success rates of 63.6 % for pancreatic duct cannulation, 45.5 % for pancreatic duct stenting, and 18.2 % for placement of a stent bridging the necrosis. Cannulation and stenting failures were due to duodenal edema and pancreatic duct stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

PPDS in ANP is associated with an unacceptably high risk of pancreatic necrosis infection. In addition, the procedure is technically challenging due to duodenal edema and ductal stenosis.

摘要

背景

在急性坏死性胰腺炎(ANP)中,胰管破裂很常见,与高发病率相关。在这项研究中,我们测试了预防性胰管支架置入术(PPDS)在 ANP 中的可行性和安全性,并将其与保守治疗进行了比较。

方法

我们前瞻性地招募了 2011 年 2 月至 2015 年 7 月期间被诊断为 ANP 的患者(年龄 18-75 岁)。这些患者在两个三级中心被前瞻性随机分为接受 PPDS 或保守治疗。随机分组后尽快进行 PPDS。

结果

对 PPDS 组胰腺坏死引起的医源性感染的担忧促使进行了中期分析,该分析证实了极高的风险。因此,出于伦理原因,该试验提前终止。在 PPDS 组的 11 例患者中,所有成功放置胰管支架的患者(5/5,100%)均出现感染,而保守治疗组仅 3 例患者(23.1%)出现感染( = 0.01)。分析显示胰管插管成功率为 63.6%,胰管支架置入成功率为 45.5%,支架跨越坏死部位放置成功率为 18.2%。插管和支架置入失败是由于十二指肠水肿和胰管狭窄所致。

结论

在 ANP 中进行 PPDS 与胰腺坏死感染的风险极高相关。此外,由于十二指肠水肿和导管狭窄,该手术技术上具有挑战性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验