Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):910-915. doi: 10.1111/cid.12751. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
To date, no clinical investigation has assessed the clinical and radiographic indices around narrow diameter implants (NDIs) and regular diameter implants (RDIs) in individuals with cigarette smoking habit and nonsmokers.
To estimate and compare the clinical and radiographic indices around NDIs (< 3.3 mm) and RDIs placed in cigarette smokers (CS) and nonsmokers (NS).
Eighty-six patients requiring implant surgery in the anterior mandible were divided into two groups (39 CS and 43 NS). Patients were further categorized into two subgroups on the basis of implant diameter: (a) patients with NDIs (3.3 mm) and (b) patients with RDIs (4.1 mm). Clinical indices evaluating plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PD) were recorded at 18 and 36 months of follow-up. Digital periapical radiographs were studied to evaluate crestal bone levels (CBL) incorporating in a specialized software and examined on a calibrated computer display screen with the help of an image analyzer.
The mean age of patients in CS group and NS group was 44.6 and 42.5 years, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall mean scores of PI, PD, and CBL around NDIs and RDIs among CS and NS patients at 18 and 36 months of follow-up. However, there was a statistically significant difference only in the overall mean BOP around NDIs and RDIs among CS and NS patients at 18 and 36 months of follow-up.
The findings of the current study suggests that NDIs can show reliable clinical stability and radiographic bone levels as RDIs placed in CS and NS, with the support of strict oral hygiene protocols.
迄今为止,尚无临床研究评估吸烟和不吸烟者中细径种植体(NDIs,<3.3mm)和常规直径种植体(RDIs)周围的临床和影像学指标。
评估并比较吸烟和不吸烟者中 NDIs(<3.3mm)和 RDIs 周围的临床和影像学指标。
86 名需在前下颌植入种植体的患者被分为两组(CS 组 39 名,NS 组 43 名)。根据种植体直径进一步将患者分为两组:(a)NDIs(3.3mm)组和(b)RDIs(4.1mm)组。在 18 和 36 个月的随访中记录评估菌斑指数(PI)、探诊出血(BOP)和探诊深度(PD)的临床指数。使用专门的软件研究数字化根尖周射线照片,以评估颊侧骨嵴顶水平(CBL),并借助图像分析器在经过校准的计算机显示屏上进行检查。
CS 组和 NS 组患者的平均年龄分别为 44.6 岁和 42.5 岁。在 18 和 36 个月的随访中,CS 和 NS 患者的 NDIs 和 RDIs 周围的 PI、PD 和 CBL 的总体平均评分无统计学差异。然而,仅在 18 和 36 个月的随访中,CS 和 NS 患者的 NDIs 和 RDIs 周围的 BOP 总体平均评分存在统计学差异。
本研究结果表明,在严格的口腔卫生方案支持下,NDIs 可显示出与 RDIs 一样的可靠临床稳定性和影像学骨水平,适用于 CS 和 NS 患者。