• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规负载牙科种植体周围软组织状况和牙槽骨吸收在吸烟和水烟(水烟管)吸烟者中的 8 年随访结果。

Soft tissue status and crestal bone loss around conventionally-loaded dental implants placed in cigarette- and waterpipe (narghile) smokers: 8-years' follow-up results.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Periodontology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):873-878. doi: 10.1111/cid.12746. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1111/cid.12746
PMID:30884091
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that crestal bone loss (CBL) and peri-implant soft tissue inflammation are increased when conventionally-loaded dental implants are placed in cigarette and waterpipe smokers compared to nonsmokers.

PURPOSE

The present 8-years' follow-up retrospective clinical study evaluated the stability of the conventionally-loaded dental implants placed in cigarette- and waterpipe (narghile) smoking and nonsmoking population group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Self-reported cigarette-smokers, waterpipe users along with never-smokers have been included. Data pertaining to gender, age, duration and frequency of cigarette-smoking, and usage of waterpipe were collected using a preformed questionnaire. Probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and peri-implant plaque index (PI) were recorded measuring mesial and distal CBL on digital bitewing radiographs. Study power estimated with group comparisons performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni post-hoc adjustment tests. Statistically significant P-values of less than 0.05 were considered.

RESULTS

Forty-one cigarette-smokers, forty waterpipe-users, and forty-two never-smokers with mean ages of 44.5 ± 4.3, 41.2 ± 4.7, 43.3 ± 2.8 years, respectively, were included. The mean duration of smoking habit and duration of each session of cigarette-smoking was 5.5 ± 0.3 years and 7.7 ± 1.2 minutes, respectively. The mean period of waterpipe use and time of each session of was 10.6 ± 0.8 years and 20.2 ± 3.1 minutes, respectively. Among cigarette-smokers, waterpipe-users and never-smokers, the implants had been in function for 8.5 ± 0.3, 8.6 ± 0.3, and 8.5 ± 0.5 years, respectively. PD, CBL, and peri-implant PI were positively more among cigarette and waterpipe smoking users (P < 0.05) than with never-smokers. Peri-implant bleeding on probing was significant among never-smokers (P < 0.05) compared to waterpipe-users and cigarette-smokers. There was no difference in Peri-implant PI, PD, and CBL in cigarette-smokers and waterpipe-users.

CONCLUSIONS

Cigarette-smokers and waterpipe users are vulnerable to peri-implant soft tissue inflammation and CBL than never-smokers. There is no variation in the severity of peri-implant soft tissue inflammation and CBL in waterpipe and cigarette users.

摘要

背景

我们假设与不吸烟者相比,常规负载牙科植入物在香烟和水烟(水烟袋)吸烟者中的牙骨质骨丢失(CBL)和种植体周围软组织炎症会增加。

目的

本研究为 8 年的回顾性临床研究,评估了在香烟和水烟(水烟袋)吸烟和不吸烟者中常规负载牙科植入物的稳定性。

材料和方法

纳入了自我报告的香烟吸烟者、水烟使用者和从不吸烟者。使用预先制定的问卷收集了有关性别、年龄、吸烟时间和频率以及水烟使用情况的数据。使用数字咬翼射线照相术测量近中和远中 CBL,记录探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血(BOP)和种植体周围菌斑指数(PI)。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Bonferroni 事后调整检验进行组间比较,估计研究能力。认为 P 值小于 0.05 具有统计学意义。

结果

共纳入 41 名香烟吸烟者、40 名水烟使用者和 42 名从不吸烟者,年龄分别为 44.5±4.3、41.2±4.7 和 43.3±2.8 岁。吸烟习惯的平均持续时间和每次吸烟的持续时间分别为 5.5±0.3 年和 7.7±1.2 分钟。水烟使用的平均时间和每次使用的时间分别为 10.6±0.8 年和 20.2±3.1 分钟。在香烟吸烟者、水烟使用者和从不吸烟者中,植入物的使用时间分别为 8.5±0.3、8.6±0.3 和 8.5±0.5 年。PD、CBL 和种植体周围 PI 在香烟和水烟吸烟者中呈正相关(P<0.05)高于不吸烟者。与水烟使用者和香烟吸烟者相比,不吸烟者的探诊出血更明显(P<0.05)。香烟吸烟者和水烟使用者的种植体周围 PI、PD 和 CBL 无差异。

结论

与不吸烟者相比,香烟吸烟者和水烟使用者更容易发生种植体周围软组织炎症和 CBL。水烟和香烟使用者的种植体周围软组织炎症和 CBL 严重程度没有差异。

相似文献

1
Soft tissue status and crestal bone loss around conventionally-loaded dental implants placed in cigarette- and waterpipe (narghile) smokers: 8-years' follow-up results.常规负载牙科种植体周围软组织状况和牙槽骨吸收在吸烟和水烟(水烟管)吸烟者中的 8 年随访结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):873-878. doi: 10.1111/cid.12746. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
2
Peri-implant soft tissue status and crestal bone levels around adjacent implants placed in cigarette smokers and never smokers: Five-year follow-up results.种植体周围软组织状况和毗邻种植体的牙槽骨水平在吸烟和非吸烟患者中的比较:五年随访结果。
J Periodontol. 2019 Mar;90(3):234-240. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0117. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
3
Self-rated peri-implant oral symptoms and clinicoradiographic characteristics in Narghile-smokers, cigarette-smokers, and nonsmokers with peri-implantitis.电子烟吸烟者、香烟吸烟者和患有种植体周围炎的非吸烟者的自我评估种植体周围口腔症状和临床影像学特征。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Dec;21(6):1235-1240. doi: 10.1111/cid.12864. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Comparison of peri-implant clinical and radiographic inflammatory parameters among cigarette and waterpipe (narghile) smokers and never-smokers.比较吸烟和水烟(水烟袋)烟民与不吸烟者的种植体周围临床和影像学炎症参数。
J Periodontol. 2018 Feb;89(2):213-218. doi: 10.1902/jop.2017.170358.
5
Peri-implant soft tissue inflammatory parameters and crestal bone loss among waterpipe (narghile) smokers and never-smokers with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.水烟(narghile)吸烟者和非吸烟者中,有和没有 2 型糖尿病的患者,种植体周围软组织炎症参数和牙槽骨吸收情况。
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89(6):645-652. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0554.
6
Peri-implant soft tissue status and crestal bone loss around immediately-loaded narrow-diameter implants placed in cigarette-smokers: 6-year follow-up results.种植体周软组织状况及即刻加载的小直径种植体周围牙槽嵴骨丧失:6 年随访结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Apr;22(2):220-225. doi: 10.1111/cid.12893. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
7
Comparison of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Parameters and Crestal Bone Loss Around Immediately Loaded and Delayed Loaded Implants in Smokers and Non-Smokers: 5-Year Follow-Up Results.比较吸烟和非吸烟患者中即刻负载和延迟负载种植体周围软组织参数和牙槽骨吸收:5 年随访结果。
J Periodontol. 2017 Jan;88(1):3-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160427. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
8
Comparison of cotinine levels in the peri-implant sulcular fluid among cigarette and waterpipe smokers, electronic-cigarette users, and nonsmokers.比较吸烟、水烟和电子烟使用者以及不吸烟者的龈沟液中可替宁水平。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):702-707. doi: 10.1111/cid.12813. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
9
Comparison of peri-implant clinical and radiographic status around short (6 mm in length) dental implants placed in cigarette-smokers and never-smokers: Six-year follow-up results.比较吸烟和不吸烟患者中植入长度为 6 毫米的短种植体周围的临床和影像学状况:六年随访结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Feb;20(1):21-25. doi: 10.1111/cid.12564. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
Peri-Implant Inflammation in Waterpipe Users and Cigarette Smokers: An Observational Study.水烟使用者和吸烟者的种植体周围炎症:一项观察性研究。
Int Dent J. 2023 Oct;73(5):717-723. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of peri-implant health and whole salivary cortisol levels in adults with mental health disorders.心理健康障碍成年人种植体周围健康状况及全唾液皮质醇水平的评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 29;15(1):31915. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85111-1.
2
The Effect of Nicotine-Containing Products on Peri-Implant Tissues: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.含尼古丁产品对种植体周围组织的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Sep 23;26(10):1276-1285. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae085.
3
Assessment of salivary alpha amylase and mucin-4 before and after non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis.
评估唾液α-淀粉酶和黏蛋白-4 在种植体周围黏膜炎非手术治疗前后的变化。
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Jul 14;8(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00429-z.
4
Ten-year Survival Rate of Cement- and Screw-retained Restorations on Bone-level Dental Implants in Grafted and Non-grafted Sites: A Retrospective Study.骨水平种植体中使用水泥和螺钉固位修复体的 10 年存活率:一项回顾性研究。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2021 Sep 30;19:517-522. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b2082139.
5
Comparison of Peri-Implant Clinicoradiographic Parameters among Non-Smokers and Individuals Using Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems at 8 Years of Follow-up.非吸烟者和使用电子尼古丁输送系统者在 8 年随访期的种植体周围临床放射学参数比较。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2021 Sep 30;19:511-516. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b2082123.