Fluit C R M G, Klaassen T P F M, Sander L, de Visser-Oomen M, van den Hurk M M
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2019;61(3):182-187.
To evaluate the quality of the supervision of residents, questionnaires are frequently used.
AIM: Changes in resident ratings were assessed using the validated Evaluation and Feedback for Effective Clinical Teaching (effect) questionnaire.
METHOD: Supervisors (n=89) of nine medical specialities were evaluated using a validated instrument (effect). Mean overall scores (mos) and mean scale scores were compared using paired t-tests. Ten supervisors were interviewed to determine factors that stimulate or hinder improvement after an evaluation.
RESULTS: The strongest increase was seen in supervisors with an mos <4.0. Motivation to improve and dialogue about the feedback stimulated improvement. Lack of time and support hindered improvement.
CONCLUSION: Evaluating supervisors by providing feedback and a dialogue is suitable to improve their supervision of residents.
为评估住院医师培训的督导质量,问卷调查被频繁使用。
使用经过验证的有效临床教学评估与反馈(effect)问卷评估住院医师评分的变化。
使用经过验证的工具(effect)对九个医学专业的89名督导进行评估。使用配对t检验比较总体平均得分(mos)和量表平均得分。采访了10名督导,以确定评估后促进或阻碍改进的因素。
mos<4.0的督导得分增长最为显著。改进的动力和关于反馈的对话促进了改进。时间和支持的缺乏阻碍了改进。
通过提供反馈和对话来评估督导人员,有助于提高他们对住院医师的培训质量。