Carvalheiro Joana, Seara-Cardoso Ana, Mesquita Ana Raquel, de Sousa Liliana, Oliveira Pedro, Summavielle Teresa, Magalhães Ana
Psychology Research Center, School of Psychology, University of Minho.
Department of Behavioural Sciences, Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto.
J Comp Psychol. 2019 Nov;133(4):452-462. doi: 10.1037/com0000178. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
Prosocial behavior in rats is known to occur in response to a familiar rat's distress, but the motivations underlying prosocial behavior remain elusive. In this study, we adapted the experimental setting of Ben-Ami Bartal, Decety, and Mason (2011) to explore different motivations behind helping behavior in adolescent rats. In the original setting, a free rat is placed in an arena where a cagemate is trapped inside a restrainer that can only be opened from the outside by the free rat. Here we added a dark compartment to the experimental setting that allowed the free rat to escape the arena and the distress evoked by the trapped cagemate, based on rodents' aversion to bright areas. As a control, we tested rats in the same arena but with the door to the dark area closed. Our results showed that all free rats, except one in the escape condition, learned to open the restrainer's door. However, in the escape condition, rats took significantly longer to open the restrainer to the cagemates when compared with rats that could not escape. To further explore the motivations underlying these group differences in door-opening latencies, we measured both rats' behavior. We found that struggling behavior (i.e., distress) in the trapped rat did not affect door-opening, whereas exploratory behavior (i.e., proactive/positive behavior) in both rats contributed to shorter times. Our results highlight that adolescent rats show prosocial behavior even when they can escape without helping and contribute to demonstrate the role of positive emotional states in prosocial behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
已知大鼠的亲社会行为是对熟悉大鼠的痛苦做出的反应,但亲社会行为背后的动机仍然难以捉摸。在本研究中,我们采用了本-阿米·巴塔尔、德西和梅森(2011年)的实验设置,以探究青春期大鼠帮助行为背后的不同动机。在原始设置中,一只自由的大鼠被放置在一个竞技场中,其同笼伙伴被困在一个只能由自由大鼠从外部打开的限制器内。在此,我们在实验设置中增加了一个黑暗隔间,基于啮齿动物对明亮区域的厌恶,使自由大鼠能够逃离竞技场以及被困同笼伙伴引发的痛苦。作为对照,我们在相同的竞技场中测试大鼠,但黑暗区域的门是关闭的。我们的结果表明,除了在可逃脱条件下的一只大鼠外,所有自由大鼠都学会了打开限制器的门。然而,在可逃脱条件下,与无法逃脱的大鼠相比,大鼠打开限制器以解救同笼伙伴的时间要长得多。为了进一步探究这些开门潜伏期组间差异背后的动机,我们测量了两只大鼠的行为。我们发现被困大鼠的挣扎行为(即痛苦)并不影响开门,而两只大鼠的探索行为(即主动/积极行为)则有助于缩短开门时间。我们的结果突出表明,即使青春期大鼠能够在不提供帮助的情况下逃脱,它们仍会表现出亲社会行为,并有助于证明积极情绪状态在亲社会行为中的作用。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)