Suppr超能文献

照顾者评估量表在军事性脑外伤中的因子分析。

Factor analysis of the Caregiver Appraisal Scale in military TBI.

机构信息

Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center.

出版信息

Rehabil Psychol. 2019 Aug;64(3):366-376. doi: 10.1037/rep0000270. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To (a) examine the factor structure of the original 47-item Caregiver Appraisal Scale (CAS) in caregivers of service members/veterans (SMVs) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and (b) assess whether the CAS yields a similar factor structure in this population compared to caregivers of civilian adults following TBI. Research Method/Design: Participants were 287 caregivers (female = 96.2%; spouse = 87.8%; mean age = 38.6 years) of SMVs who sustained a mild, moderate, severe, or penetrating TBI, recruited from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and via caregiver community outreach. Caregivers completed the CAS, Caregiver Questionnaire, and Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 upon enrollment in the study.

RESULTS

Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed four factors that explained 43.2% of the variance in CAS scores: Perceived Burden, Caregiving Relationship Satisfaction, Caregiving Ideology, and Caregiving Mastery. Thirty-seven of the 47 CAS items loaded significantly onto only one of the four factors (≥ .40). A secondary PCA was performed on these 37 items, resulting in a four-factor solution very similar to that of the 47-item solution, which explained 46.8% of the variance in the 37-item measure. All but one item loaded significantly on a factor corresponding to a conceptually similar construct.

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Military and civilian caregivers have overlapping and differing concerns. The findings support a 37-item four-factor model of caregiving stress appraisal that has the potential for use as an outcome measure for developing caregiver interventions. It may be as useful to administer a reduced 37-item measure of the CAS to caregivers as the original 47-item measure, but further development is required. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

(a)检验创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后服务成员/退伍军人(SMV)照顾者原始 47 项照顾者评估量表(CAS)的因素结构;(b)评估 CAS 在该人群中的因素结构是否与 TBI 后照顾平民成年人的因素结构相似。

研究方法/设计:参与者为 287 名照顾者(女性=96.2%;配偶=87.8%;平均年龄=38.6 岁),他们的 SMV 患有轻度、中度、重度或穿透性 TBI,招募自沃尔特·里德国家军事医疗中心和照顾者社区外联。照顾者在参加研究时完成了 CAS、照顾者问卷和梅奥-波特兰适应量表-4。

结果

主成分分析(PCA)显示,CAS 评分的 43.2%可由四个因素解释:感知负担、照顾关系满意度、照顾意识形态和照顾掌握程度。47 项 CAS 条目中有 37 项显著加载到仅一个因素上(≥.40)。对这 37 个项目进行了二次 PCA,得到了一个与 47 项解决方案非常相似的四因素解决方案,该方案解释了 37 项测量中 46.8%的方差。除一项外,所有项目都显著加载到与概念上相似结构相对应的因素上。

结论/意义:军人和平民照顾者有重叠和不同的关注点。这些发现支持了一个 37 项四因素的照顾者压力评估模型,该模型有可能作为开发照顾者干预措施的结果测量工具。与原始的 47 项测量相比,使用简化的 37 项 CAS 测量可能同样有用,但需要进一步开发。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验