• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)I 类医疗器械召回情况的探索性分析:2014 - 2018年

An exploratory analysis of U.S. FDA Class I medical device recalls: 2014-2018.

作者信息

Sarkissian Alfred

机构信息

a Falls Church , VA , USA.

出版信息

J Med Eng Technol. 2018 Nov;42(8):595-603. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2019.1580778. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1080/03091902.2019.1580778
PMID:30896310
Abstract

Medical device manufacturing and distribution is globalised; consequently, medical device failures pose serious but preventable global public health hazard. Moreover, a clear understanding of recalls will help firms improve their operations. This study examines 871 U.S. FDA Class I (i.e. most serious) medical device recalls, highlights the shortcomings of the recall reporting system and proposes recommendations for improvement. Top three recall reasons are: "packaging" (47.4%), "component" issues (14%) and "design" (13.3%). About 40% of recall events have mischaracterised or ambiguous "FDA Determined Cause". Ninety-four firms are related to the recalls and the majority (78%) of the recall events emanate from U.S.-headquartered firms. Thirty-four firms (36%) have been acquired or are a subsidiary of another. Results also yield recommendations for improvement. The cause classification scheme needs revision and there might be a case for more than one classification scheme. Specifically, the "device design" cause designation is conflated with "component quality" issues. "Other", "unknown" and "under investigation" designations should be replaced with real cause determinations. The effectiveness of "Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)" and the impact of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) on device quality should be examined. Devising a "recall severity measure" and improving and standardising the recalls database are other important issues. Results and recommendations may hold lessons for other jurisdictions as well.

摘要

医疗设备的制造和分销已全球化;因此,医疗设备故障构成了严重但可预防的全球公共卫生危害。此外,对召回的清晰理解将有助于企业改善其运营。本研究调查了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的871起I类(即最严重的)医疗设备召回事件,突出了召回报告系统的缺陷,并提出了改进建议。前三大召回原因是:“包装”(47.4%)、“部件”问题(14%)和“设计”(13.3%)。约40%的召回事件存在错误定性或模糊的“FDA确定原因”。94家公司与召回事件有关,大多数(78%)召回事件源于总部位于美国的公司。34家公司(36%)已被收购或为另一家公司的子公司。研究结果还提出了改进建议。原因分类方案需要修订,可能需要不止一种分类方案。具体而言,“设备设计”原因指定与“部件质量”问题混淆。“其他”、“未知”和“正在调查中”的指定应替换为实际原因判定。应检查“良好生产规范(GMP)”的有效性以及并购(M&A)对设备质量的影响。制定“召回严重程度衡量标准”以及改进和规范召回数据库是其他重要问题。研究结果和建议可能也能为其他司法管辖区提供借鉴。

相似文献

1
An exploratory analysis of U.S. FDA Class I medical device recalls: 2014-2018.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)I 类医疗器械召回情况的探索性分析:2014 - 2018年
J Med Eng Technol. 2018 Nov;42(8):595-603. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2019.1580778. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Medical Device Recalls in Radiation Oncology: Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Data, 2002-2015.放射肿瘤学中的医疗器械召回:对美国食品药品监督管理局2002 - 2015年数据的分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):438-446. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
3
Overview of high-risk medical device recalls in obstetrics and gynecology from 2002 through 2016: implications for device safety.2002年至2016年妇产科高风险医疗器械召回概述:对器械安全性的影响
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):42-46.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 May 10.
4
Medical Device Recalls in Orthopedics: Recent Trends and Areas for Improvement.骨科医疗器械召回:最新趋势和改进领域。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2259-2266. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.025. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
5
Major FDA medical device recalls in ophthalmology from 2003 to 2015.2003 年至 2015 年美国食品药品监督管理局眼科领域主要医疗器械召回事件。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;53(2):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
6
How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?骨科器械在首次获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)上市前批准后会发生怎样的变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):1053-68. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4634-x. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
7
Research: Evaluation of Orthopedic Hip Device Recalls by the FDA from 2007 to 2017.研究:2007 年至 2017 年 FDA 对骨科髋关节器械召回的评估。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2020 Nov 1;54(6):418-426. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-54.6.418.
8
Overview of Class I Device Recalls in Diagnostic Radiology, 2002-2015.2002 - 2015年诊断放射学中I类设备召回概述
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Jun;13(6):638-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.12.025. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
9
[Analysis of FDA medical device recall in 2005-2006].[2005 - 2006年美国食品药品监督管理局医疗器械召回分析]
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi. 2011 Jul;35(4):280-3.
10
Error Types and Associations of Clinically Significant Events Within Food and Drug Administration Recalls of Linear Accelerators and Related Products.医疗器械不良事件监测对临床合理用械的意义及影响
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan-Feb;10(1):e8-e15. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Care Technology Disruptions Associated With the CrowdStrike Outage.与CrowdStrike中断相关的患者护理技术中断
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2530226. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.30226.
2
Characterization of US Food and Drug Administration Class I Recalls from 2018 to 2022 for Moderate- and High-Risk Medical Devices: A Cross-Sectional Study.2018年至2022年美国食品药品监督管理局对中高风险医疗器械的I类召回情况:一项横断面研究
Med Devices (Auckl). 2023 May 19;16:111-122. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S412802. eCollection 2023.
3
Investigation and analysis of four countries' recalls of osteosynthesis implants and joint replacement implants from 2011 to 2021.
2011 年至 2021 年,对四个国家的骨接合植入物和关节置换植入物召回的调查与分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Oct 7;17(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03332-w.
4
Rapid response to medical device recalls: an organized patient-centered team effort.医疗器械召回的快速响应:有组织的以患者为中心的团队努力。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Feb 1;18(2):663-667. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9748.
5
Impact of Design on Medical Device Safety.设计对医疗器械安全性的影响。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jul;54(4):839-849. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00022-4. Epub 2019 Dec 9.