Suppr超能文献

伦理与证据

Ethics and Evidence.

作者信息

Sulmasy Daniel P

机构信息

Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia USA.

出版信息

J Clin Ethics. 2019 Spring;30(1):56-66.

Abstract

Towards the end of the last century, bioethics underwent an "empirical turn," characterized by an increasing number of empirical studies about issues of bioethical concern. Taking a cue from the evidence-based medicine movement, some heralded this as a turn toward evidence-based ethics. However, it has never been clear what this means, and the strategies and goals of evidence-based ethics remain ambiguous. In this article, the author explores what the potential aims of this movement might be, ultimately arguing that, while the development of good empirical research can and should aid in ethical deliberation, one ought to avoid assuming or suggesting that empirical studies themselves determine normative prescriptions and proscriptions. The limits of the use of empirical studies in bioethics are explored in detail, and 10 potential ways that such studies can soundly contribute to bioethics are described. Good ethics depends upon sound facts, but ethics cannot be based on evidence alone.

摘要

在上个世纪末,生物伦理学经历了一次“实证转向”,其特点是关于生物伦理问题的实证研究越来越多。受循证医学运动的启发,一些人将此视为向循证伦理学的转变。然而,这到底意味着什么,循证伦理学的策略和目标仍然模糊不清。在本文中,作者探讨了这一运动的潜在目标可能是什么,最终认为,虽然良好的实证研究的发展能够且应该有助于伦理审议,但人们应该避免假定或暗示实证研究本身就能决定规范性的规定和禁令。本文详细探讨了实证研究在生物伦理学中使用的局限性,并描述了这类研究能够合理地为生物伦理学做出贡献的10种潜在方式。良好的伦理学依赖于可靠的事实,但伦理学不能仅仅基于证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验