Paul Campbell Erwin is with the School of Public Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham. During article preparation, Renee G. Parks, Stephanie Mazzucca, Peg Allen, Hengrui Hu, and Ross C. Brownson were with the Prevention Research Center in St Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Elizabeth A. Baker is with the Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO. Johnnetta Davis-Joyce is with the National Association of County and City Health Officials, Washington, DC.
Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):739-747. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304958. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
To determine the extent to which US local health departments (LHDs) are engaged in evidence-based public health and whether this is influenced by the presence of an academic health department (AHD) partnership.
We surveyed a cross-sectional stratified random sample of 579 LHDs in 2017. We ascertained the extent of support for evidence-based decision-making and the use of evidence-based interventions in several chronic disease programs and whether the LHD participated in a formal, informal, or no AHD partnership.
We received 376 valid responses (response rate 64.9%). There were 192 (51.6%) LHDs with a formal, 80 (21.6%) with an informal, and 99 (26.7%) with no AHD partnership. Participants with formal AHD partnerships reported higher perceived organizational supports for evidence-based decision-making and interventions compared with either informal or no AHD partnerships. The odds of providing 1 or more chronic disease evidence-based intervention were significantly higher in LHDs with formal AHD partnerships compared with LHDs with no AHD partnerships (adjusted odds ratio = 2.3; 95% confidence interval = 1.3, 4.0).
Formal academic-practice partnerships can be important means for advancing evidence-based decision-making and for implementing evidence-based programs and policies.
确定美国地方卫生部门(LHD)参与循证公共卫生的程度,以及这是否受到学术卫生部门(AHD)合作关系的影响。
我们于 2017 年对 579 个 LHD 进行了横断面分层随机抽样调查。我们确定了在多个慢性病项目中支持循证决策和使用循证干预的程度,以及 LHD 是否参与了正式、非正式或无 AHD 合作关系。
我们收到了 376 份有效回复(回复率 64.9%)。有 192 个(51.6%)LHD 与 AHD 有正式合作关系,80 个(21.6%)有非正式合作关系,99 个(26.7%)没有 AHD 合作关系。与非正式或无 AHD 合作关系相比,有正式 AHD 合作关系的参与者报告称,他们对循证决策和干预措施的组织支持更高。与无 AHD 合作关系的 LHD 相比,有正式 AHD 合作关系的 LHD 提供 1 种或多种慢性病循证干预措施的可能性显著更高(调整后的优势比=2.3;95%置信区间=1.3,4.0)。
正式的学术实践伙伴关系可以成为推进循证决策以及实施循证项目和政策的重要手段。