Mazzucca Stephanie, Parks Renee G, Tabak Rachel G, Allen Peg, Dobbins Maureen, Stamatakis Katherine A, Brownson Ross C
Prevention Research Center in St Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri (Drs Mazzucca, Tabak, Allen, and Brownson and Ms Parks); National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools and Health Evidence, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada (Dr Dobbins); Department of Epidemiology, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri (Dr Stamatakis); and Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri (Dr Brownson).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Sep/Oct;25(5):454-463. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000952.
Fostering evidence-based decision making (EBDM) within local public health departments and among local health department (LHD) practitioners is crucial for the successful translation of research into public health practice to prevent and control chronic disease.
The purpose of this study was to identify organizational supports for EBDM within LHDs and determine psychometric properties of a measure of organizational supports for EBDM in LHDs.
Cross-sectional, observation study.
Local public health departments in the United States.
Local health department practitioners (N = 376) across the United States participated in the study.
Local health department practitioners completed a survey containing 27 items about organizational supports for EBDM. Most items were adapted from previously developed surveys, and input from researchers and practitioners guided survey development. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test and refine the psychometric properties of the measure.
The final solution included 6 factors of 22 items: awareness of EBDM (3 items), capacity for EBDM (7 items), resources availability (3 items), evaluation capacity (3 items), EBDM climate cultivation (3 items), and partnerships to support EBDM (3 items). This factor solution achieved acceptable fit (eg, Comparative Fit Index = 0.965). Logistic regression models showed positive relationships between the 6 factors and the number of evidence-based interventions delivered.
This study identified important organizational supports for EBDM within LHDs. Results of this study can be used to understand and enhance organizational processes and structures to support EBDM to improve LHD performance and population health. Strong measures are important for understanding how LHDs support EBDM, evaluating interventions to improve LHD capacity, and to guide programmatic and policy efforts within LHDs.
在地方公共卫生部门以及地方卫生部门(LHD)从业者中促进循证决策(EBDM),对于将研究成果成功转化为公共卫生实践以预防和控制慢性病至关重要。
本研究旨在确定地方卫生部门内对循证决策的组织支持,并确定衡量地方卫生部门循证决策组织支持的量表的心理测量特性。
横断面观察性研究。
美国地方公共卫生部门。
美国各地的地方卫生部门从业者(N = 376)参与了该研究。
地方卫生部门从业者完成了一项包含27个关于循证决策组织支持项目的调查。大多数项目改编自先前开发的调查,研究人员和从业者的意见指导了调查的开发。验证性因素分析用于测试和完善该量表的心理测量特性。
最终模型包含6个因素共22个项目:循证决策意识(3个项目)、循证决策能力(7个项目)、资源可用性(3个项目)、评估能力(3个项目)、循证决策氛围培育(3个项目)以及支持循证决策的伙伴关系(3个项目)。该因素模型具有可接受的拟合度(例如,比较拟合指数 = 0.965)。逻辑回归模型显示这6个因素与实施的循证干预措施数量之间存在正相关关系。
本研究确定了地方卫生部门内对循证决策的重要组织支持。本研究结果可用于理解和加强组织流程与结构,以支持循证决策,从而提高地方卫生部门的绩效和人群健康水平。有力的测量方法对于了解地方卫生部门如何支持循证决策、评估提高地方卫生部门能力的干预措施以及指导地方卫生部门内的项目和政策努力非常重要。