Kunzweiler Colin P, Bailey Robert C, Mehta Supriya D, Okall Duncan O, Obondi Eve, Djomand Gaston, Nyunya Boaz Otieno, Otieno Fredrick O, Graham Susan M
a Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , IL , USA.
b Nyanza Reproductive Health Society , Kisumu , Kenya.
AIDS Care. 2018 Aug;30(sup5):S76-S88. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1510109.
The UNAIDS 90-90-90 target has prioritized achieving high rates of viral suppression. We identified factors associated with viral suppression among HIV-positive gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in Kisumu, Kenya. HIV-positive participants in the Anza Mapema study were offered antiretroviral therapy (ART) regardless of CD4 count. HIV viral load was assessed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Viral suppression was defined as <1,000 copies/mL. Sociodemographic, sexual behaviors, and psychosocial characteristics were assessed via audio computer-assisted self interview. We used generalized estimating equations to estimate the associations between baseline and time-dependent predictors and viral suppression at 6 and 12 months. Seventy-five HIV-positive men were enrolled in the Anza Mapema study, of which 63 had at least one viral load measured during follow-up. Among 52 men with a viral load measure at month 6, 37 (71%) were on ART and virally suppressed. Among 59 men with a viral load measure at month 12, 37 (63%) were on ART and virally suppressed. In the final multivariable model, men who reported receptive or versatile sexual position during anal intercourse with a male partner had reduced odds of viral suppression (aOR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.08-0.50). Greater levels of coping self-efficacy were associated with increased odds of viral suppression (aOR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03-1.16). Despite extensive initiation, retention, and adherence support, the rate of viral suppression in this population did not meet the UNAIDS 90-90-90 target (81% for individuals aware of their HIV status). Pervasive stigma against male-male sex, especially men who practice receptive anal sex, may underlie our findings, which highlight the need for advocacy and stigma reduction efforts. Because coping self-efficacy was a protective factor, efforts to promote resilience in addition to healthy sexual identity development may lead to improved care outcomes among GBMSM in this area.
联合国艾滋病规划署的90-90-90目标将实现高病毒抑制率列为优先事项。我们确定了肯尼亚基苏木地区艾滋病毒呈阳性的男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性(GBMSM)中与病毒抑制相关的因素。安扎·马佩马研究中的艾滋病毒呈阳性参与者无论CD4细胞计数如何均接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)。在基线以及随访6个月和12个月后评估艾滋病毒载量。病毒抑制定义为<1000拷贝/毫升。通过音频计算机辅助自我访谈评估社会人口统计学、性行为和心理社会特征。我们使用广义估计方程来估计基线和随时间变化的预测因素与6个月和12个月时病毒抑制之间的关联。75名艾滋病毒呈阳性的男性参与了安扎·马佩马研究,其中63人在随访期间至少进行了一次病毒载量检测。在第6个月进行病毒载量检测的52名男性中,37人(71%)接受了ART且病毒得到抑制。在第12个月进行病毒载量检测的59名男性中,37人(63%)接受了ART且病毒得到抑制。在最终的多变量模型中,报告在与男性伴侣肛交时处于接受或通用体位的男性病毒抑制几率降低(调整后比值比[aOR]=0.20;95%置信区间:0.08-0.50)。更高水平的应对自我效能与病毒抑制几率增加相关(aOR=1.10;95%置信区间:1.03-1.16)。尽管提供了广泛的启动、留存和依从性支持,但该人群的病毒抑制率未达到联合国艾滋病规划署的90-90-90目标(知晓自身艾滋病毒感染状况的个体为81%)。对男男性行为,尤其是进行接受肛交的男性的普遍污名化可能是我们研究结果的原因,这凸显了开展宣传和减少污名化努力的必要性。由于应对自我效能是一个保护因素,除了促进健康的性身份发展外,努力提高心理韧性可能会改善该地区GBMSM的护理结局。