Tatum James M, Barmparas Galinos, Dhillon Navpreet K, Edu Sorin, Margulies Daniel R, Ley Eric J, Nicol Andrew J, Navsaria Pradeep H
Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Trauma Centre, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Invest Surg. 2020 Dec;33(10):896-903. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1576810. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
Selective nonoperative management of neck injuries from penetrating mechanism has become an acceptable management strategy. We herein characterize current management strategies of cervical pharyngoesophageal injuries implemented by trauma surgeons in the United States. The National Trauma Data Bank datasets 2007-2011 were queried for penetrating pharyngeal and/or cervical esophageal injuries. Subjects surviving 24 hours or more were analyzed based on whether a surgical exploration was pursued and by gunshot versus stabbing mechanism. In all, 1,256 patients were identified, representing 6% of all penetrating neck injuries during the study period. The majority (84%) were male, with a median age of 27 years. Injury severity was high (median score of 14). Compared to stabbing victims, gunshot patients were more likely to have associated cervical spine (24% vs. 1%, < .01) and carotid artery injury (14% vs. 9%, < .01). Neck exploration was performed in 49% of patients who survived at least 24 hours, with 90% occurring within the first day of admission. Of patients who underwent a delayed neck exploration, 35% required a tracheostomy and 41% required a feeding tube placement. The overall mortality was 4%. Nonoperative management was not associated with increased odds for death (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.55, = .17). Nonoperative management of penetrating pharyngoesophageal injuries is commonly utilized with no effect on mortality.
对于穿透性机制导致的颈部损伤,选择性非手术治疗已成为一种可接受的治疗策略。我们在此描述了美国创伤外科医生对颈段咽食管损伤的当前治疗策略。查询了2007 - 2011年国家创伤数据库中穿透性咽部和/或颈段食管损伤的数据。对存活24小时及以上的患者,根据是否进行手术探查以及损伤机制是枪伤还是刺伤进行分析。总共识别出1256例患者,占研究期间所有穿透性颈部损伤的6%。大多数(84%)为男性,中位年龄为27岁。损伤严重程度较高(中位评分为14分)。与刺伤患者相比,枪伤患者更易合并颈椎损伤(24%对1%,P < 0.01)和颈动脉损伤(14%对9%,P < 0.01)。49%存活至少24小时的患者进行了颈部探查,其中90%在入院第一天内进行。在接受延迟颈部探查的患者中,35%需要气管切开,41%需要放置饲管。总体死亡率为4%。非手术治疗与死亡几率增加无关(调整后的优势比(AOR)为0.55,P = 0.17)。穿透性咽食管损伤的非手术治疗被广泛采用,且对死亡率无影响。