• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经椎动脉穿透性损伤:美国创伤中心的介入治疗和结果。

Penetrating injuries to the vertebral artery: interventions and outcomes from US Trauma Centers.

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, LAC + USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, 2051 Marengo Street, Inpatient Tower, C5L100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb;48(1):481-488. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01416-y. Epub 2020 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-020-01416-y
PMID:32567022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7306101/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Penetrating injuries to the vertebral artery are rare and incompletely studied. Operative, angioembolic, and nonoperative strategies are management options, although the association between management strategy and outcomes is unknown. This study endeavored to define the epidemiology, management strategy, and outcomes after penetrating injuries to the vertebral artery presenting to trauma centers nationwide.

METHODS

Patients with veterbral artery injuries were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) (2016-2017) using ICD-10-CM codes. Only those with penetrating mechanisms of injury were included in the study. Transferred patients were excluded. Study groups were defined by management strategy (Operative management, OM; angioembolization, AE; and nonoperative management, NOM). Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes were compared between groups using univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was used to examine independent risk factors for mortality and stroke.

RESULTS

Penetrating injuries to the vertebral artery were rare (n = 476, < 1% of NTDB patient population). Median age was 28 [IQR 21-37] years and 81% (n = 385) of patients were male. Interpersonal violence was the most common injury intent (n = 374, 79%). Most patients were managed with NOM (n = 409, 86%), with AE and OM utilized less frequently (8% and 6%, respectively). Stab wounds were the most frequent mechanism of injury among patients managed with OM (62%), while gunshot wounds were most common among patients managed with NOM (84%) or AE (79%). Multivariate analysis of risk factors for stroke revealed only associated carotid artery injury (OR 4.236, 95% CI 1.284-13.970, p = 0.018) and AE (OR 6.342, 95% CI 1.417-28.399, p = 0.016) were independent predictors. Independent risk factors for mortality were advanced age (OR 1.026, 95% CI 1.001-1.052, p = 0.044); elevated ISS (OR 1.030, 95% CI 1.008-1.052, p = 0.006); and associated traumatic brain injury (OR 3.020, 95% CI 1.333-6.843, p = 0.008). Higher ED GCS was independently associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.788, 95% CI 0.731-0.849, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebral artery injuries after penetrating mechanisms are infrequent in the United States. Patients with these injuries tend to be young adult men who were injured by gunshot wounds as a result of interpersonal violence. The majority of these injuries were managed nonoperatively, with operative intervention required most commonly for patients injured by stab wounds. Risk factors for both stroke and mortality were principally due to patient factors and associated injuries. Increased risk of stroke among patients managed with angioembolization will need to be further investigated with future study to determine if this risk is imparted from the management strategy itself or from underlying injury characteristics.

摘要

目的

椎动脉穿透性损伤较为罕见,且研究尚不充分。手术、血管栓塞和非手术治疗策略都是可行的选择,尽管管理策略与结果之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定全国创伤中心收治的椎动脉穿透性损伤的流行病学、管理策略和结局。

方法

本研究使用国际疾病分类第 10 版临床修订版(ICD-10-CM)代码从国家创伤数据库(NTDB)(2016-2017 年)中识别出椎动脉损伤患者。仅纳入穿透性损伤机制的患者。转院患者被排除在外。研究组根据管理策略(手术治疗、OM;血管栓塞、AE;和非手术治疗、NOM)进行定义。使用单变量分析比较组间患者人口统计学、损伤特征和结局。使用多变量逻辑回归分析检查死亡率和卒中的独立危险因素。

结果

穿透性椎动脉损伤较为罕见(n=476,<NTDB 患者人群的 1%)。中位年龄为 28 [IQR 21-37] 岁,81%(n=385)的患者为男性。人际暴力是最常见的受伤原因(n=374,79%)。大多数患者接受 NOM 治疗(n=409,86%),AE 和 OM 的使用率较低(分别为 8%和 6%)。刺伤是 OM 治疗患者中最常见的损伤机制(62%),而枪伤是 NOM 治疗(84%)或 AE(79%)治疗患者中最常见的损伤机制。对卒中风险因素的多变量分析显示,仅伴发颈动脉损伤(OR 4.236,95%CI 1.284-13.970,p=0.018)和 AE(OR 6.342,95%CI 1.417-28.399,p=0.016)是独立的预测因素。死亡率的独立危险因素包括高龄(OR 1.026,95%CI 1.001-1.052,p=0.044);高损伤严重程度评分(ISS)(OR 1.030,95%CI 1.008-1.052,p=0.006);伴发创伤性脑损伤(OR 3.020,95%CI 1.333-6.843,p=0.008)。较高的急诊格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)与降低死亡率独立相关(OR 0.788,95%CI 0.731-0.849,p<0.001)。

结论

美国穿透性椎动脉损伤较为罕见。这些损伤的患者多为年轻成年男性,因人际暴力而被枪击受伤。这些损伤主要通过非手术治疗,而刺伤患者则需要进行手术治疗。卒中与死亡率的危险因素主要归因于患者自身因素和伴发损伤。接受血管栓塞治疗的患者卒中风险增加,需要进一步研究未来的研究,以确定这种风险是否来自治疗策略本身,还是源自潜在的损伤特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6658/7306101/e80f6f979bf7/68_2020_1416_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6658/7306101/f8e1100a5398/68_2020_1416_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6658/7306101/a28ff84f1b7d/68_2020_1416_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6658/7306101/323de3672602/68_2020_1416_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6658/7306101/e80f6f979bf7/68_2020_1416_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6658/7306101/f8e1100a5398/68_2020_1416_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6658/7306101/a28ff84f1b7d/68_2020_1416_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6658/7306101/323de3672602/68_2020_1416_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6658/7306101/e80f6f979bf7/68_2020_1416_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Penetrating injuries to the vertebral artery: interventions and outcomes from US Trauma Centers.经椎动脉穿透性损伤:美国创伤中心的介入治疗和结果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb;48(1):481-488. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01416-y. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
2
Penetrating injuries in Germany - epidemiology, management and outcome an analysis based on the TraumaRegister DGU®.德国的穿透性损伤 - 基于创伤登记处 DGU®的流行病学、处理和结局分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 13;29(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00895-1.
3
Epidemiology, repair technique, and predictors of stroke and mortality in penetrating carotid artery injuries.穿透性颈动脉损伤的流行病学、修复技术及卒中与死亡率的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Oct;78(4):920-928. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.019. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
4
Selective Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Shotgun Wounds.选择性非手术治疗腹部霰弹枪伤。
J Surg Res. 2021 Mar;259:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
Nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries in children.儿童腹部实性器官穿透伤的非手术治疗
J Surg Res. 2018 Aug;228:188-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
6
Shotgun Wounds: Nationwide Trends in Epidemiology, Injury Patterns, and Outcomes from US Trauma Centers.散弹枪伤:美国创伤中心的全国流行病学、损伤模式和结局趋势。
J Emerg Med. 2020 May;58(5):719-724. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
7
Contemporary management of penetrating renal trauma - A national analysis.当代穿透性肾损伤的处理-全国性分析。
Injury. 2020 Jan;51(1):32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
8
Penetrating trauma in urban women: patterns of injury and violence.城市女性的穿透性创伤:损伤和暴力模式。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):592-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.026. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
9
A systematic review of penetrating extracranial vertebral artery injuries.穿透性颅外椎动脉损伤的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jun;71(6):2161-2169. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.084. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
10
Feasibility of selective non-operative management for penetrating abdominal trauma in France.法国穿透性腹部创伤选择性非手术治疗的可行性
J Visc Surg. 2017 Jun;154(3):167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Penetrating neck trauma: a comprehensive review.穿透性颈部创伤:全面综述
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Mar 24;10(1):e001619. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001619. eCollection 2025.
2
Navigating the Role of Surgery in Optimizing Patient Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBIs): A Comprehensive Review.探讨手术在优化创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者预后中的作用:一项综合综述。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 10;16(10):e71234. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71234. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Brazilian guidelines on diagnosis and management of traumatic vascular injuries.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of heart failure as a rare complication of traumatic arteriovenous fistulas.创伤性动静脉瘘罕见并发症中的心力衰竭:系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):1087-1094.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.138. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
巴西创伤性血管损伤诊断与处理指南
J Vasc Bras. 2023 Oct 30;22:e20230042. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300422. eCollection 2023.
4
Vertebral artery transection with pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula requiring antegrade and retrograde embolization.椎动脉横断伴假性动脉瘤和动静脉瘘,需进行顺行和逆行栓塞治疗。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2022 Mar 3;8(2):183-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.01.009. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Penetrating vertebral artery injury treated by combining the "zone" approach and imaging tests: A case report.采用“区域”方法与影像学检查相结合治疗穿透性椎动脉损伤:一例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2021 Nov 22;9(11):e05134. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5134. eCollection 2021 Nov.