Center for Arrhythmia Care, Heart and Vascular Center, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Center for Arrhythmia Care, Heart and Vascular Center, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar;5(3):330-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
This study assessed the impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation on hospitalization and antiarrhythmic drug use in the community setting.
Despite the widespread increase in the use of catheter ablation to treat AF in the United States, the impact of ablation on arrhythmic, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular hospitalizations remains unclear.
The national prospectively acquired Truven Health MarketScan data set (January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014) was used to identify patients who underwent first time AF ablation with uninterrupted enrollment for 24 months (12 months pre-ablation and 12 months post-ablation). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of hospitalization.
Of 5,238 patients who underwent AF ablation for the first time, 2,720 patients with uninterrupted enrollment were analyzed (age 60 ± 10 years; 29% were women, 79% had hypertension, and 23% had heart failure [HF]). AF ablation was associated with significantly reduced all-cause hospitalization from 1,669 hospitalizations in the year before ablation to 1,034 hospitalizations in the year after ablation, which was driven primarily by a 56% reduction in arrhythmic hospitalization. Nonarrhythmic cardiovascular hospitalizations also declined through a 43% drop off in HF hospitalizations. Noncardiovascular hospitalization rates did not significantly change. Age younger than 55 years (odds ratio [OR]: 1.43; p < 0.001), obstructive sleep apnea (OR: 1.38; p < 0.001), and HF (OR: 1.29; p = 0.024) were multivariate predictors for decreased arrhythmic hospitalization. Rates of antiarrhythmic drug use also significantly declined post-procedure by 37.5% (p < 0.001).
In this nationwide cohort, AF ablation was associated with significant decreases in arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic cardiovascular hospitalizations, which was driven by reductions in hospitalization for AF and HF.
本研究评估了心房颤动(AF)消融术在社区环境下对住院和抗心律失常药物使用的影响。
尽管在美国广泛增加了导管消融术治疗 AF,但消融术对心律失常、心血管和非心血管住院的影响仍不清楚。
使用全国前瞻性获得的 Truven Health MarketScan 数据集(2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日),确定首次接受 AF 消融术且连续登记 24 个月(消融前 12 个月和消融后 12 个月)的患者。采用多变量逻辑回归确定住院的预测因素。
在 5238 例首次接受 AF 消融术的患者中,分析了 2720 例连续登记的患者(年龄 60 ± 10 岁;29%为女性,79%患有高血压,23%患有心力衰竭[HF])。与消融前一年的 1669 次住院相比,AF 消融后一年的全因住院显著减少至 1034 次,这主要归因于心律失常住院减少了 56%。非心律失常性心血管住院也因心力衰竭住院减少 43%而下降。非心血管住院率没有显著变化。年龄小于 55 岁(优势比[OR]:1.43;p<0.001)、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OR:1.38;p<0.001)和心力衰竭(OR:1.29;p=0.024)是心律失常性住院减少的多变量预测因素。术后抗心律失常药物的使用率也显著下降了 37.5%(p<0.001)。
在这项全国性队列研究中,AF 消融术与心律失常和非心律失常性心血管住院的显著减少相关,这是由 AF 和 HF 住院减少驱动的。