• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度悖论:教育水平上升,女性就业却在下降。

INDIAN PARADOX: RISING EDUCATION, DECLINING WOMENS' EMPLOYMENT.

作者信息

Chatterjee Esha, Desai Sonalde, Vanneman Reeve

机构信息

University of Maryland, College Park, USA.

出版信息

Demogr Res. 2018 Jan-Jun;38:855-878. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.31. Epub 2018 Mar 6.

DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.31
PMID:30899196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6424343/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Theories of human capital would suggest that with more education, women acquire greater skills and their earnings increase, resulting in higher labor force participation. However, it has been long known that in India, women's education has a U-shaped relationship with labor force participation. Part of the decline at moderate levels of education may be due to an income effect whereby women with more education marry into richer families that enable them to withdraw from the labor force.

OBJECTIVE

The paper uses the first comprehensive Indian income data to evaluate whether the other family income effect explains the negative relationship between moderate women's education and their labor force participation.

METHODS

Using two waves of the India Human Development Survey, a comprehensive measure of labor force participation is regressed on educational levels for currently married women, 25-59.

RESULTS

We find a strong other family income effect that explains some but not all of the U-shape education relationship. Further analyses suggest the importance of a lack of suitable employment opportunities for moderately educated women.

CONCLUSION

Other factors need to be identified to explain the paradoxical U-shape relationship. We suggest the importance of occupational sex segregation, which excludes moderately educated Indian women from clerical and sales jobs.

CONTRIBUTION

This paper provides a more definitive test of the other family income effect and identifies new directions for future research that might explain the paradoxical U-curve relationship.

摘要

背景

人力资本理论表明,随着受教育程度提高,女性会获得更多技能,收入增加,从而劳动力参与率上升。然而,长期以来人们都知道,在印度,女性教育与劳动力参与率呈U形关系。中等教育水平下女性劳动力参与率下降的部分原因可能是收入效应,即受教育程度较高的女性会嫁入更富裕的家庭,从而能够退出劳动力市场。

目的

本文利用印度首份全面的收入数据,评估其他家庭收入效应是否能解释中等教育水平的女性与劳动力参与率之间的负相关关系。

方法

利用两轮印度人类发展调查的数据,对25至59岁已婚女性的劳动力参与率综合指标与教育水平进行回归分析。

结果

我们发现了很强的其他家庭收入效应,它能解释部分而非全部的U形教育关系。进一步分析表明,缺乏适合中等教育水平女性的就业机会很重要。

结论

需要找出其他因素来解释这种矛盾的U形关系。我们指出职业性别隔离的重要性,它使中等教育水平的印度女性无法从事文职和销售工作。

贡献

本文对其他家庭收入效应进行了更确切的检验,并为未来研究指明了新方向,这些研究可能会解释这种矛盾的U形曲线关系。

相似文献

1
INDIAN PARADOX: RISING EDUCATION, DECLINING WOMENS' EMPLOYMENT.印度悖论:教育水平上升,女性就业却在下降。
Demogr Res. 2018 Jan-Jun;38:855-878. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.31. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
2
An analysis of women's labor force participation in France: cross-section estimates and time-series evidence.法国女性劳动力参与情况分析:横截面估计与时间序列证据
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S177-200. doi: 10.1086/298080.
3
Explaining the MENA Paradox: Rising Educational Attainment, Yet Stagnant Female Labor Force Participation.解读中东和北非地区的悖论:教育程度不断提高,但女性劳动力参与率却停滞不前。
Demogr Res. 2020 Jul-Dec;43:817-850. doi: 10.4054/demres.2020.43.28. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Women's labour force participation and socioeconomic development: influences of local context and individual characteristics in Brazil.巴西女性劳动力参与率与社会经济发展:当地背景和个人特征的影响
Br J Sociol. 1993 Mar;44(1):25-51.
5
Intercountry comparisons of labor force trends and of related developments: an overview.劳动力趋势及相关发展的国家间比较:概述
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S1-32. doi: 10.1086/298074.
6
The labor-force participation of married women in the Soviet Union: a household cross-section analysis.苏联已婚女性的劳动力参与率:一项家庭横截面分析。
J Comp Econ. 1983 Jun;7(2):158-76. doi: 10.1016/0147-5967(83)90084-7.
7
Women's labour force participation in Australia: recent research findings.澳大利亚女性劳动力参与情况:近期研究发现
J Aust Popul Assoc. 1996 May;13(1):67-92. doi: 10.1007/BF03029322.
8
Fertility-mortality variations across LDCs: women's education, labor force participation, and contraceptive-use.最不发达国家的生育-死亡率差异:妇女教育、劳动力参与率和避孕措施使用情况
Kyklos. 1994;47(2):209-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02256.x.
9
Why are more women working in Britain?为什么在英国有更多女性参加工作?
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S147-76. doi: 10.1086/298079.
10
With progress for some. Women and development in India.对一些人来说有进步。印度的妇女与发展。
IDRC Rep. 1984 Jul;13(2):4-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping women's work in India: An application of small area estimation.描绘印度女性的工作:小区域估计的一种应用
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 19;20(2):e0317783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317783. eCollection 2025.
2
Adolescent Gender Beliefs in India: Does Mothers' Empowerment Matter?印度青少年的性别观念:母亲的赋权重要吗?
Soc Sci Res. 2025 Mar;127. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103132. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
3
Precarity in a Time of Uncertainty: Gendered Employment Patterns during the Covid-19 Lockdown in India.不确定时期的不稳定状况:印度新冠疫情封锁期间的性别化就业模式
Fem Econ. 2021;27(1-2):152-172. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2021.1876903. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
"I Have No Room of My Own": COVID-19 Pandemic and Work-From-Home Through a Gender Lens.“我没有自己的空间”:透过性别视角看新冠疫情与居家办公
Gender Issues. 2022;39(4):507-533. doi: 10.1007/s12147-022-09302-0. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
5
Non-Parental Family Members as Brokers of Family Social Capital: Compensatory Time Use in India.非父母家庭成员作为家庭社会资本的中介:印度的补偿性时间利用
Soc Sci (Basel). 2020 Dec;9(12). doi: 10.3390/socsci9120217. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
The gendered practices of the upwardly mobile in India.印度向上流动者的性别化实践。
Soc Sci Res. 2022 Mar;103:102652. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102652. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
7
The labor force participation of Indian women before and after widowhood.印度女性在丧偶前后的劳动力参与情况。
Demogr Res. 2020 Jul-Dec;43:673-706. doi: 10.4054/demres.2020.43.24. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
8
The Paradox of Declining Female Work Participation in an Era of Economic Growth.经济增长时代女性劳动参与率下降的悖论。
Indian J Labour Econ. 2019 Mar;62(1):55-71. doi: 10.1007/s41027-019-00162-z. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of women's labor force participation on the distribution of income in the United States.美国女性劳动力参与对收入分配的影响。
Annu Rev Sociol. 1987;13:259-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.001355.
2
Time-series growth in the female labor force.女性劳动力的时间序列增长。
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S59-90. doi: 10.1086/298076.