Desai Sonalde, Deshmukh Neerad, Pramanik Santanu
University of Maryland, Department of Sociology and NCAER.
University of Maryland, Department of Sociology.
Fem Econ. 2021;27(1-2):152-172. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2021.1876903. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
India implemented one of the world's most stringent lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 crisis. This paper examines whether the impacts of the lockdown on employment differed by gender in areas surrounding Delhi. An ongoing monthly employment survey between March 2019 and May 2020 allows for comparison in employment before and after the lockdown. Estimates based on random-effects logistic regression models show that for men, the predicted probability of employment declined from 0.88 to 0.57, while that for women fell from 0.34 to 0.22. Women's concentration in self-employment may be one of the reasons why women's employment was somewhat protected. However, when we look only at wage workers, we find that women experienced greater job losses than men with predicted employment probability for wage employment for men declining by 40 percent compared to 72 percent for women.
为应对新冠疫情危机,印度实施了全球最严格的封锁措施之一。本文研究了德里周边地区封锁措施对就业的影响是否因性别而异。2019年3月至2020年5月期间进行的一项月度就业调查,使得我们能够比较封锁前后的就业情况。基于随机效应逻辑回归模型的估计结果显示,对于男性而言,就业的预测概率从0.88降至0.57,而女性的这一概率则从0.34降至0.22。女性集中于自主创业可能是女性就业受到一定程度保护的原因之一。然而,当我们仅关注受雇工人时,我们发现女性比男性经历了更大的失业,男性受雇工作的预测就业概率下降了40%,而女性则下降了72%。