• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于监测术后恶心呕吐预防的标准化电子算法

Standardised electronic algorithms for monitoring prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

作者信息

Gillmann Hans-Jörg, Wasilenko Sascha, Züger Jonathan, Petersen Antje, Klemann Anna, Leffler Andreas, Stueber Thomas

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2019 Mar;15(2):408-415. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.83293. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

DOI:10.5114/aoms.2019.83293
PMID:30899294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6425213/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite comprehensive guidelines with high-grade evidence, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a frequent problem in anaesthesia care. Anaesthesia information management systems (AIMS) may aid clinicians in PONV prevention, but their benefit is critically dependent on the details of implementation into practice. This study aimed to examine strengths and weaknesses of the local AIMS-based algorithm in prevention of PONV.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) of a university hospital and included 10 604 patients aged 18 or older who were followed up in the PACU (intracranial, obstetrical or cardiothoracic surgery excluded) from March 2013 until March 2014. The PONV incidence in PACU and AIMS data validity were analysed.

RESULTS

Adherence to PONV guideline recommendations was considerably low, with only 5749 (54%) of the patients receiving correct PONV prophylaxis. Two thousand seven hundred sixty-six (26%) of the patients received an insufficient PONV prophylaxis, which was associated with an excess PONV incidence (11% vs. 4% with correct prophylaxis, < 0.001) in the PACU. Two thousand four hundred forty-nine (23%) of all patients were discharged from the PACU with an insufficient PONV prophylaxis despite perioperative digital PONV prevention algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to PONV prophylaxis guidelines in the era of AIMS software and decision support is still remarkably low. The AIMS data usefulness depends on the user, the type of data input and the configuration of the software. Adherence to correct PONV prophylaxis should be re-evaluated systematically before discharge from PACU.

摘要

引言

尽管有基于高级别证据的全面指南,但术后恶心呕吐(PONV)仍是麻醉护理中常见的问题。麻醉信息管理系统(AIMS)可能有助于临床医生预防PONV,但其益处严重依赖于在实际应用中的实施细节。本研究旨在探讨基于本地AIMS的算法在预防PONV方面的优缺点。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究在一所大学医院的麻醉后护理单元(PACU)进行,纳入了2013年3月至2014年3月在PACU接受随访的10604例18岁及以上患者(排除颅内、产科或心胸外科手术患者)。分析了PACU中的PONV发生率和AIMS数据的有效性。

结果

对PONV指南建议的依从性相当低,只有5749例(54%)患者接受了正确的PONV预防措施。2766例(26%)患者接受的PONV预防措施不足,这与PACU中PONV发生率过高相关(正确预防措施组为4%,不足预防措施组为11%,<0.001)。尽管有围手术期数字PONV预防算法,但所有患者中有2449例(23%)从PACU出院时PONV预防措施不足。

结论

在AIMS软件和决策支持时代,对PONV预防指南的依从性仍然非常低。AIMS数据的有用性取决于用户、数据输入类型和软件配置。在从PACU出院前,应系统地重新评估对正确PONV预防措施的依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2932/6425213/2bcd86474ba0/AMS-15-35961-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2932/6425213/027e96dc8d1f/AMS-15-35961-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2932/6425213/53a28422575a/AMS-15-35961-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2932/6425213/c3382124cd55/AMS-15-35961-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2932/6425213/2bcd86474ba0/AMS-15-35961-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2932/6425213/027e96dc8d1f/AMS-15-35961-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2932/6425213/53a28422575a/AMS-15-35961-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2932/6425213/c3382124cd55/AMS-15-35961-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2932/6425213/2bcd86474ba0/AMS-15-35961-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Standardised electronic algorithms for monitoring prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting.用于监测术后恶心呕吐预防的标准化电子算法
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Mar;15(2):408-415. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.83293. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
2
Postoperative nausea and vomiting following inpatient surgeries in a teaching hospital: a retrospective database analysis.一家教学医院住院手术后的术后恶心呕吐:一项回顾性数据库分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jun;22(6):1093-9. doi: 10.1185/030079906X104830.
3
The length of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit correlates with pain intensity, nausea and vomiting on arrival.术后恢复室停留时间与到达时的疼痛强度、恶心和呕吐相关。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2014 Nov 26;3(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13741-014-0010-8. eCollection 2014.
4
Postoperative nausea and vomiting at Landspitali: A prospective study.兰德斯医院术后恶心呕吐:一项前瞻性研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Apr;68(4):457-465. doi: 10.1111/aas.14375. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
5
Simplified algorithm for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a before-and-after study.简化术后恶心呕吐预防算法:一项前后对照研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
6
The effect of a multifaceted postoperative nausea and vomiting reduction strategy on prophylaxis administration amongst higher-risk adult surgical patients.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018 Mar;46(2):185-189. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1804600207.
7
Risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting in hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study after spinal anaesthesia including intrathecal morphine.髋关节和膝关节置换术后恶心和呕吐的风险:一项包括鞘内吗啡的脊髓麻醉后前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Sep 23;20(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01154-z.
8
Early post-operative nausea and vomiting: A retrospective observational study of 2030 patients.术后早期恶心呕吐:2030 例患者的回顾性观察研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Oct;65(9):1229-1239. doi: 10.1111/aas.13936. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
9
Consensus guideline adoption for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting.术后恶心呕吐管理的共识指南采用情况
WMJ. 2012 Oct;111(5):207-13; quiz 214.
10
Automated reminders increase adherence to guidelines for administration of prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting.自动化提醒可提高术后恶心呕吐预防用药指南的依从性。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Feb;27(2):187-91. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832d6a76.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in prescribing for the prevention of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain following abdominal surgery: A retrospective study.腹部手术后预防恶心、呕吐和疼痛的处方差异:一项回顾性研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 14;6(6):e1335. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1335. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Acupuncture combined with ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A randomised controlled trial.针刺联合昂丹司琼预防高危患者腹腔镜妇科手术后恶心呕吐的随机对照试验。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Jul;11(6):564-575. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12421. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The validity of self-reported vs. measured body weight and height and the effect of self-perception.自我报告的体重和身高与测量的体重和身高的有效性以及自我认知的影响。
Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jan;14(1):174-181. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.61401. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
2
A comprehensive guidelines-based approach reduces cardiovascular risk in everyday practice: the VARO study.基于综合指南的方法可降低日常实践中的心血管风险:VARO研究。
Arch Med Sci. 2017 Jun;13(4):705-710. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.64865. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
3
Influence of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure level on pulmonary complications in emergency major trauma surgery.
Management strategies for the treatment and prevention of postoperative/postdischarge nausea and vomiting: an updated review.
术后/出院后恶心呕吐的治疗与预防管理策略:最新综述
F1000Res. 2020 Aug 13;9. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21832.1. eCollection 2020.
术中呼气末正压水平对急诊重大创伤手术肺部并发症的影响。
Arch Med Sci. 2017 Mar 1;13(2):396-403. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.59868. Epub 2016 May 12.
4
Changes in pre-hospital management of vascular risk factors among patients admitted due to recurrent stroke in Poland from 1995 to 2013.1995年至2013年波兰因复发性中风入院患者血管危险因素的院前管理变化。
Arch Med Sci. 2016 Aug 1;12(4):754-9. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.60963. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
5
Ondansetron-droperidol combination vs. ondansetron or droperidol monotherapy in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.昂丹司琼-氟哌利多联合用药与昂丹司琼或氟哌利多单药治疗预防术后恶心呕吐的比较
Arch Med Sci. 2015 Apr 25;11(2):362-70. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.50968. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
6
Systematic assessment of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic agent: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.右美托咪定作为麻醉剂的系统评价:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Arch Med Sci. 2014 Feb 24;10(1):19-24. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.40730. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
7
The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index.随机对照试验结果的统计学显著性往往很脆弱:关于脆弱性指数的一个案例。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;67(6):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
8
Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting.术后恶心呕吐管理的共识指南。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Jan;118(1):85-113. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000002.
9
Defining and measuring completeness of electronic health records for secondary use.定义和衡量电子健康记录在二次使用中的完整性。
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Oct;46(5):830-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
10
The effects of an electronic medical record on the completeness of documentation in the anesthesia record.电子病历对麻醉记录完整性的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Aug;82(8):702-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 31.