Suppr超能文献

韩国男性生物标志物的选择及生物年龄估计模型的比较

Selection of a set of biomarkers and comparisons of biological age estimation models for Korean men.

作者信息

Jee Haemi

机构信息

Department of Sports and Health Care, Namseoul University, Cheonan, Korea.

出版信息

J Exerc Rehabil. 2019 Feb 25;15(1):31-36. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836644.322. eCollection 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Biological age (BA) represents the rate of the senescence with a set of biomarkers. The BA prediction models have not been compared to obtain an optimal BA prediction model with BA biomarkers for Korean men. The study aims to obtain a set of BA biomarkers and compare three of the reported statistical approaches for an optimal BA prediction model. The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys data of 2009 to 2011 were used to select six BA biomarkers from 940 healthy subjects aged between 30 to 80 years. The multiple linear regression (MLR), principal component analysis (PCA), and Klemera and Doubal methods (KDM) were used to obtain three BA prediction models. Correlation coefficients () with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and regression slopes were assessed. One of the Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, mobility, was compared for feasibility test of each BA models. KDM showed greatest correlation (=0.88 [<0.05]) with smallest 95% CI and regression slope (1.00). PCA also showed strong correlation (=0.79 [<0.05]) with small 95% CI and regression slope (0.94). MLR (=0.68 [<0.05]) showed over and underestimated BA results at the end of the age spectrum. Estimations of BA were most reliable with KDM. The PCA and MLR approaches were comparatively simple to devise for Korean men.

摘要

生物学年龄(BA)通过一组生物标志物来反映衰老速率。尚未对BA预测模型进行比较以获得针对韩国男性的最佳BA生物标志物预测模型。本研究旨在获得一组BA生物标志物,并比较三种已报道的统计方法以建立最佳BA预测模型。利用2009年至2011年韩国国家健康与营养检查调查的数据,从940名年龄在30至80岁之间的健康受试者中筛选出六种BA生物标志物。采用多元线性回归(MLR)、主成分分析(PCA)和克莱梅拉与杜巴尔方法(KDM)来获得三种BA预测模型。评估了相关系数()及其95%置信区间(CI)和回归斜率。比较了欧洲五维健康量表中的一个维度,即活动能力,以对每个BA模型进行可行性测试。KDM显示出最大的相关性(=0.88 [<0.05]),其95%CI和回归斜率最小(1.00)。PCA也显示出较强的相关性(=0.79 [<0.05]),95%CI较小且回归斜率为(0.94)。MLR(=0.68 [<0.05])在年龄范围末端高估和低估了BA结果。KDM对BA的估计最为可靠。对于韩国男性而言,PCA和MLR方法设计起来相对简单。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159d/6416494/a0b559994806/jer-15-1-31f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验