• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向父母讲解基因组学,为其提供癌症易感性的种系检测:使用两访同意模式。

Speaking genomics to parents offered germline testing for cancer predisposition: Use of a 2-visit consent model.

机构信息

Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.

Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.

出版信息

Cancer. 2019 Jul 15;125(14):2455-2464. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32071. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.32071
PMID:30901077
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer are increasingly offered genomic sequencing, including germline testing for cancer predisposition or other disorders. Such testing is unfamiliar to patients and families, and clear communication is needed to introduce genomic concepts and convey risk and benefit information.

METHODS

Parents of children with cancer were offered the opportunity to have their children's tumor and germline examined with clinical genomic sequencing. Families were introduced to the study with a 2-visit informed consent model. Baseline genetic knowledge and self-reported literacy/numeracy were collected before a study introduction visit, during which basic concepts related to genomic sequencing were discussed. Information was reinforced during a second visit, during which informed consent was obtained and a posttest was administered.

RESULTS

As reflected by the percentage of correct answers on the pretest and posttest assessments, this model increased genetic knowledge by 11.1% (from 77.8% to 88.9%; P < .0001) in 121 parents participating in both the study introduction and consent visits. The percentage of parents correctly identifying the meaning of somatic and germline mutations increased significantly (from 18% to 59% [somatic] and from 31% to 64% [germline]; P < .0001). Nevertheless, these concepts remained unfamiliar to one-third of the parents. No relation was identified between the change in the overall percentage of correct answers and self-reported literacy, numeracy, or demographics.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a 2-visit communication model improved knowledge of concepts relevant to genomic sequencing, particularly differences between somatic and germline testing; however, these areas remained confusing to many participants, and reinforcement may be necessary to achieve complete understanding.

摘要

背景

越来越多的癌症患者被提供基因组测序,包括用于癌症易感性或其他疾病的种系检测。这种测试对患者和家属来说是陌生的,需要进行清晰的沟通,以介绍基因组概念并传达风险和收益信息。

方法

为患有癌症的儿童的父母提供了机会,让他们的孩子的肿瘤和种系接受临床基因组测序。通过两访式知情同意模式向家庭介绍了该研究。在研究介绍访问之前收集了基本遗传知识和自我报告的读写能力/计算能力,在此期间讨论了与基因组测序相关的基本概念。在第二次访问期间强化了信息,在此期间获得了知情同意并进行了后测。

结果

通过前测和后测评估的正确答案百分比反映,这种模式使 121 名参加研究介绍和同意访问的父母的遗传知识增加了 11.1%(从 77.8%提高到 88.9%;P<.0001)。正确识别体细胞和种系突变含义的父母比例显著增加(从 18%提高到 59%[体细胞]和从 31%提高到 64%[种系];P<.0001)。然而,这些概念对三分之一的父母来说仍然不熟悉。整体正确答案百分比的变化与自我报告的读写能力、计算能力或人口统计学特征之间没有关系。

结论

使用两访式沟通模式提高了对与基因组测序相关的概念的理解,特别是体细胞和种系检测之间的差异;然而,这些领域对许多参与者来说仍然令人困惑,可能需要强化才能达到完全理解。

相似文献

1
Speaking genomics to parents offered germline testing for cancer predisposition: Use of a 2-visit consent model.向父母讲解基因组学,为其提供癌症易感性的种系检测:使用两访同意模式。
Cancer. 2019 Jul 15;125(14):2455-2464. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32071. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
2
Parents' and patients' perspectives, experiences, and preferences for germline genetic or genomic testing of children with cancer: A systematic review.父母和患儿对癌症患儿进行种系遗传或基因组检测的观点、经验和偏好:系统评价。
Genet Med. 2024 Sep;26(9):101197. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101197. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
Parental Preferences Surrounding Timing and Content of Consent Conversations for Clinical Germline Genetic Testing Following a Child's New Cancer Diagnosis.父母对儿童新发癌症诊断后临床种系遗传检测的同意谈话时间和内容的偏好。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Oct;6:e2200323. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00323.
4
Feasibility of an Assessment Tool for Children's Competence to Consent to Predictive Genetic Testing: a Pilot Study.儿童同意进行预测性基因检测能力评估工具的可行性:一项试点研究。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Dec;24(6):971-7. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9835-7. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
5
Integrating next-generation sequencing into pediatric oncology practice: An assessment of physician confidence and understanding of clinical genomics.将下一代测序技术整合到儿科肿瘤学实践中:对医生对临床基因组学的信心和理解的评估。
Cancer. 2017 Jun 15;123(12):2352-2359. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30581. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
6
Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study.参与者对基于网络的以读写能力为重点的基因组实施研究知情同意方法的反应。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823907. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
7
The PiGeOn project: protocol of a longitudinal study examining psychosocial and ethical issues and outcomes in germline genomic sequencing for cancer.PiGeOn 项目:一项纵向研究的方案,旨在研究癌症种系基因组测序中的心理社会和伦理问题及结果。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 23;18(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4366-x.
8
Parents' and children's attitudes toward the enrollment of minors in genetic susceptibility research: implications for informed consent.父母与子女对未成年人参与基因易感性研究的态度:对知情同意的影响
Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Feb 1;116A(4):315-23. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10040.
9
Managing Pandora's Box: Familial Expectations around the Return of (Future) Germline Results.应对潘多拉魔盒:家庭对(未来)种系结果反馈的期望
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):152-165. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2063994. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
10
Mainstreaming informed consent for genomic sequencing: A call for action.将基因组测序知情同意纳入主流:行动呼吁。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 May;148:405-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental perspectives on the use of tumor molecular profiling and germline genetic testing during their children's cancer treatment.父母对在其子女癌症治疗期间使用肿瘤分子谱分析和种系基因检测的看法。
Fam Cancer. 2025 Aug 11;24(3):63. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00488-2.
2
Exploring Literacy and Knowledge Gaps and Disparities in Genetics and Oncogenomics Among Cancer Patients and the General Population: A Scoping Review.探索癌症患者和普通人群在遗传学和肿瘤基因组学方面的读写能力、知识差距及差异:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;13(2):121. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020121.
3
Narrative review on ethical and psychological issues raised by genetic and genomic testing in pediatric oncology care.
关于儿科肿瘤护理中基因和基因组检测引发的伦理与心理问题的叙述性综述。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1955. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1955. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
Psychological and ethical issues raised by genomic in paediatric care pathway, a qualitative analysis with parents and childhood cancer patients.儿科照护路径中基因组引发的心理和伦理问题:对父母和儿童癌症患者的定性分析。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Nov;32(11):1446-1455. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01653-4. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
5
Experiences of pediatric cancer patients (age 12-18 years) with extensive germline sequencing for cancer predisposition: a qualitative study.青少年癌症患者(12-18 岁)广泛进行癌症易感性种系测序的体验:一项定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 May;32(5):567-575. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01565-3. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
Genomes for Nurses: Understanding and Overcoming Barriers to Nurses Utilizing Genomics.护士的基因组学:理解并克服护士运用基因组学的障碍
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs. 2024 Mar-Apr;41(2):140-147. doi: 10.1177/27527530231214540. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
7
Parental Understanding of Their Child's Germline Genomic Testing: Intent of Disclosure to Their Child and Family.父母对其子女种系基因组检测的理解:向子女及家人披露检测结果的意图。
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 28;13(12):1656. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121656.
8
Knowledge, attitudes and decision regret: a longitudinal survey study of participants offered genome sequencing in the 100,000 Genomes Project.知识、态度和决策后悔:在 10 万基因组计划中提供基因组测序的参与者的纵向调查研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Dec;31(12):1407-1413. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01470-1. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
9
Parents' expectations, preferences, and recall of germline findings in a childhood cancer precision medicine trial.父母对儿童癌症精准医学试验中种系研究结果的期望、偏好和回忆。
Cancer. 2023 Nov 15;129(22):3620-3632. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34917. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
10
Gene therapy in sickle cell disease: Attitudes and informational needs of patients and caregivers.镰状细胞病的基因治疗:患者和照护者的态度和信息需求。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Jun;70(6):e30319. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30319. Epub 2023 Mar 28.